2006-12-05
17:06:31
·
39 answers
·
asked by
hey
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
i would. one- shes democrat, and any democrat in the white house is better than republican, two- shes a woman. i don't know why women can't be more empowered by that. men have shoved women aside since the beginning, and now it could finally be a womans turn to run the country.. much better than bush. but then you always have your women that will do whatever a man tells them... :(
2006-12-05
17:17:24 ·
update #1
those of you who said yes actually gave some good answers.. not "hell no." which tells me nothing.
2006-12-05
17:18:55 ·
update #2
Sure. Women's empowerment is important in every country. So many countries have woman leaders, there is no reason that the US can't have one.
2006-12-05 17:15:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Zabanya 6
·
4⤊
3⤋
I'm a conservative, I wouldn't vote for Hillary Clinton. Not because she's a Democrat, but because I don't see things the same as she does. I wish people would stop voting for someone just because they are Democrat or Republican. It amazes me that people will already have their minds made up on who they're voting for before even hearing what the candidate has to say. Shows how one sided people can be.
2006-12-06 04:36:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes of course. She is smarter and more thoughtful than most any man in the Country. She is a force in her own right. The right winger republicans have been working overtime for decades trying to nail her for something, anything just to stop her momentum.
The Special Prosecutor spent 30 million dollars and years trying to nail her or Bill Clinton for some, or any, valuation of the law, but they could not do it, and it killed them.
Hillary is smarter than they ever dreamed of being because she is a genuine person.
Just look at the last six years of flabbergasting failure and deceit, and ask yourself what Hillery has ever done that could match the sickest bunch of Republican Office holders in history.
They have been liars, crooks, cheats and dishonest and worse than failures across board.
Hillary could do a better job than Bush without even breaking a sweat. Just wait for the history books to pass judgment on this Congress and this President. It will not be pretty.
Bring Hillary on, because men have just worn out their welcome with pious horse droppings and contemptuous behavior not to mention homicidal idiocy.
2006-12-05 17:31:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by zclifton2 6
·
2⤊
4⤋
actually, she has my help. I intend to artwork on her campaign and have already provided my centers. i could not get Hillary for President t-shirts rapid sufficient with the aid of the internet, I have already got 3. i've got discovered donning them is prompting communicate everywhere i circulate on errands/procuring. Many have asked me the place i offered them and a few have stopped me to ask why I help her, which facilitated a pair of fairly stable conversations. i'm completely for Hillary, each and each of how.
2016-12-11 03:07:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's too much of the idea of male dominance. Females and their menstrual cycle? What about males and their egos. So it has been the norm that a male leads the country but change can be good. Plus, Hillary seems to have quite a few good ideas in mind and she's a strong willed woman. She certainly has the experience (being senator) so I'd say, give her a chance. Besides, there's always Bill Clinton there, as First Gentlemen?
2006-12-05 17:14:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Interpol 2
·
4⤊
4⤋
Nope, she's a woman and women should never be president. Also, she's a democrat.
2006-12-06 01:07:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I will support Hillary the same way she supported me as a Soldier.
By undermining everything she says, does or fails to do. I will cut the goverment budget back to Nothing so it is almost on the brink of non function. seneators on welfare and foodstamps..just like us during the 90's. I will use her suffering and sacrifice however and when ever it suits my agenda. I will watch as my brothers are attacked and the criminals dance in the streets of some 3rd world rat hole. and do nothing. i Will not point out that in an open letter to America that the reason we were attacked because of our weak responce to above. I will then vote to send Soldiers to war and when it gets rough turn on them. To promote my gain of power at ALL costs.
so uh. no..dont think so not now or ever. hell it even bothers me that she's giving lawyers a bad name.
2006-12-05 21:49:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by horgurce 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
No! I have already had enough of her as president under Mr. Bill.
Even if she was the only choice on the ballot then I would still not vote for her!
2006-12-06 04:27:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by fatboysdaddy 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes i would she is a great person and a democrate and anybody who even says anything about bein on "the rag" is a sexist pig tell that crap to your mother and watch how quick she smacks your as$... she basically already ran the country once so why not offically?
2006-12-05 23:59:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by sarah 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes. She'd probably do a good job. She's an independent person, so those who are "afraid" of letting Bill back into the White House need not worry.
I'll vote for any Democrat who's on the ballot for President. Chances are slim (even more so after Bush) that I'll vote for a Republican for President.
Also, why are some people concerned about her flipping out during her period, she's in her late-50's, probably post-menopause, so I think she'll be okay and not launch any nukes just because she feels like it.
2006-12-05 17:13:39
·
answer #10
·
answered by amg503 7
·
4⤊
6⤋
You shouldn't only vote because she's a female democrat. That shows ignorance.
Vote because of issues. If you like where she stands that's one thing but you're just asking for another George Bush if you vote on appearances!
2006-12-05 17:28:47
·
answer #11
·
answered by ? 5
·
3⤊
2⤋