2006-12-05 15:53:44 · 17 answers · asked by cotopaximary 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
No more violations for chatting.
2006-12-05 15:55:41 · answer #1 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
The age limit - to 21! Then they could be a little more lax with the language thing. The second thing I would do is permanently bar anyone and drop their entire yahoo account if they talked about molesting kids, because there's no room for stuff like that anywhere!!!
2006-12-05 23:56:43 · answer #2 · answered by The Nana of Nana's 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would put a group in charge of screening the questions before they are posted to make sure they are "good", not offensive, and not ones that just take up space.
2006-12-06 00:08:11 · answer #3 · answered by jennycf2 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The people who ask the really stupid questions or give really stupid answers would be instantly blocked from using Yahoo Answers.
2006-12-06 00:07:40 · answer #4 · answered by Say What? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The low amounts of points you get for every action except receiving best answer status.
2006-12-06 00:03:01 · answer #5 · answered by Meeeeee! 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would endow the right to comment on some of these lame answers that people use just to get points.
2006-12-05 23:58:20 · answer #6 · answered by weazalus 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
get rid of thumbs down all together. if you get a rude answer, the red flag button is always available for you. next, I'd close down yahoo answers completely without warning.
2006-12-05 23:58:55 · answer #7 · answered by the BABY 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I would make it an 18 and older site (still no pornography though) and make people have to verify their age somehow (without a credit card)
2006-12-06 00:34:09 · answer #8 · answered by mom_of_4 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ater you answer a question on a higher"page"you go back to the
page you were on,not back to the begining.
2006-12-06 00:00:11 · answer #9 · answered by Rich B 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Apparently their sense of humor. Especially on P&S.
2006-12-05 23:57:48 · answer #10 · answered by Mental Floss 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋