i will not say replace....infact they should be used together....u need to write down something and its good if u can show something while explaining any particular subject.
2006-12-05 15:12:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by mr_BIG 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on the student. This country needs to realize that every person learns differently. Computers will help some students learn better than a traditional classroom. Other students would be lost with computers.
2006-12-05 15:12:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, because
a. the level of education will improve.
b. reading through visualization is far more better compared to text book learning.
c. if a student is absent for a day, we can train him the lessons that he had missed easily.
2006-12-05 17:36:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
no it cannot be replace. only a human teacher can give proper information and educate the child. and not only that it also helps the students to know how to interact with people
2006-12-05 15:10:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
In some subjects , but this is difficult to employ in other subjects , especially for subjects requiring clinical experience.
2006-12-05 15:47:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes it is very simple that whatever you see is embedded firmly in your memory and whatever you hear and read is not that effective
2006-12-05 15:08:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by suchsi 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it doesn't allow for human interaction or hands on experimenting.
2006-12-05 15:31:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by mar 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
yes b'coz students are sick with the regular course of studies
2006-12-05 15:15:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Humaira Khan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋