The Socs and the Greasers had a big rumble. Do you think the rumble was worth it? Give me three good reasons why and explain.
Thank you
2006-12-05 14:59:49 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
No it was not worth it.
1) It just separated the groups even more.
2) People got hurt.
3) The greasers got in alot of more trouble.
2006-12-05 15:02:59 · answer #1 · answered by Liz♥ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My memories. That may sound like a weird answer, but if you really think about it, an actual event is gone in the blink of an eye. The memory is there for years or even a life time. Don't get me wrong, my loved ones are beyond important to me, but just like moments in time, they will one day leave this place and me with it. However, my memories of them can NEVER be taken away (unless I get Alzheimer's of course, and if that happens, I hope someone shoots me)! I lost two very dear family members last year and the one thing that has helped me get through it is the fact that even though their physical bodies are gone, they still live on in my memories. I can visit them any time I want, just by re-living beautiful moments I had with them. Life would be worth nothing, in my opinion, if we could not keep a memory of it with us once the moment has passed. Even the bad or painful memories are important, because they help us to avoid similar situations in the future. In my opinion, amnesia is truly a horrifying concept, and I pity people who lose their memories much more than I pity people who have lost limbs. When you lose a limb, it can be replaced with an artificial one that works almost as well. You can't replace a memory. It is a treasure whose loss is a tragedy that can never be made up for. It is the closest someone can come to losing their life without actually dying.
2016-05-22 23:02:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
well
I think it was worth it:
1. The Greasers needed to get even for the useless beating they gace to Johnny
2. It Would finally settle who was tougher.
3. They all agreed to it, its not like one gang just attacked the other without warning. They all wanted it to happen.
2006-12-05 15:04:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The movie downplayed it big time. The acting (at least in that one part of the movie, though I loved the rest of it) stank. In the book, it was worth it. It had to do with honor, self-respect and revenge, on both sides. That remains one of my favorite books, and its a goodmovie :)
2006-12-05 15:20:23 · answer #4 · answered by piratewench 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the author of the Outsiders makes the characters seem kinda gay. I don't think a guy would normally admire a man like the author makes ponyboy admire that one guy at the beggining of the book.
2006-12-05 15:05:12 · answer #5 · answered by ♥Boricua♥ 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Violence never solves anything...just causes more trouble.
2006-12-05 15:11:44 · answer #6 · answered by mar 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do your own homework!
2006-12-05 15:03:02 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋