Question to those that CONDONE RACE MIXING?

Question

If all Lions and Tigers bred together there would be no more lions and tigers. If races all blend together, there will be no more Blacks, no more Whites, no more Asians,. It would cause the genocide of many races. Why don't you call it genocide? Did you know that is one of the reasons why there are Fewer North American Indians
in the United States? It is because they interbred with whites and their race almost went extinct. When races blend the children of such unions are confused. Everyone needs an identity.
It also seems unnatural different races are in romantic relationships. It is like a lion and tiger, the only breed when in closed quaters. Do you want there to be no more Lions or Tigers?

Answer 1

Do you only date Sicilians? If not then you are race mixing too.

Guys, I think she likes all of the attention she is getting. Lord knows she doesn't get any at home :(

Her Avatar doesn't even look white. Who is she kidding?

Answer 2

Your erroneous reasoning almost defies belief. The concept of race is not biological, but sociological. Humans display variety, just as there are many varieties of roses. There are many varieties of collies and beagles, for example. Race, on the other hand, is an intellectual aberration, based upon the greedy, self-centered desire of some people to attempt to dominate other people.
Let me consider your points one-by-one!
"If all Lions and Tigers bred together there would be no more lions and tigers." You open with a conclusion that includes absolutely no scientific supportive evidence. Well let's speculate! Why don't lions and tigers mate together? Could it be that these two type of cats don't like each other,and are not attracted to each other? For example, I am not attractive to obese women, whether you refer to them as "black," "white," "asian," or any other label. Then, based upon your original scientifically unsupported assertion, you conclude: "If races all blend together, there willbe no more Blacks, no more Whites, no more Asians. It would cause the genocide of many races." What is sancrosanct about "white," "black," (color-focused labels) and "asian," (continent-based) label. If these varieties of humans had children, all that would do is produce new varieties of humans. So-called "whites" might be less "white" physiologically, and etc.
I also find it interesting that you say this so-called genocide will affect "many," not all races. Which one would survive, according to your scenario, and why? Then you concluded, in an amazing "whitewash" of history: " . . . there are fewer North American Indians in the United States . . . because they interbred with whites and their race almost went extinct. You casually ignore dozens of salient historical facts. Consider this one: " . . .Since the native Indians . . .had no written language, the written history goes back to the arrival of the white man in 1790. The newcomers were welcomed and trade flourished between the two camps until mid-1800, when the newly established United States began to exterminate the "Red Indians" and take over their land. Within a generation, the native Indians were killed off by whole-sale massacres, starvation, and epidemics brought in by the white settlers, and by the 1840s, the Indian population shrank to fewer than one-tenth the population before the Caucasians arrived."
Then you conclude, again with no basis or proof, that: "When races blend the children of such unions are confused,. Everyone needs an identity." How doyou know those children are confused? What you do base the conclusion on?
Finally, after all of these erroneous, baseless conclusions, you ask: "Do you want there to be no more Lions or Tigers?
My answer--so what! I do not believe the human existence will be significantly affected if there were no lions or tigers. And, based on what you imply, we will not be seriously disminished if there were no "blacks," "whites," or "Asians.": Have a nice day!

Answer 3

Have you seen ligers? It does not look like a mistake. On the other hand, you are not an animal (I assume), so you can choose to strictly date your race. The differences between lions and Tigers are not racial.

Have you thought of a world of one race? Did you give it serious thought and find the mistake?

There are also more women in the world than men. What should we do about this to make sure than men do not go extinct? Since you seem to have the answers.

Race is not an identity. Culture and behaviour identifies you. Just as you can have a calm tiger and a fierce one... see identities here? Frankly speaking, your behaviors and actions identify you. For example, you have identified yourself as possibly being racist.

Also, genocide is a deliberate massacre, not a step closer to evolution.

You do know that the chances of you being strictly from one race is very slim. Especially since we now have a bigger brain, we are taller, and race is not just confined to being Asian, Black or White (you know, the three main races).

Answer 4

This is a weak argument chock full of guilt-ridden associations and rhetorical questions. Firstly, the SEPARATION of races is what causes racial cleansing (genocide). Racial mixing would DECREASE the want of racial cleansing because there would BE no "superior race". The reason there are fewer Native Americans in the United States is because they died off when we forced them off their land, not because they "all interbred with Europeans". Next, it is not "unnatural" for different individuals of the same species to interbreed. In the evolutionary sense, hybridisation, when the offspring is viable, produces better individuals a phenomenon sometimes called as "Hybrid Vigor". Of course a lion and a tiger mating is unnatural; THEY ARE TWO DIFFERENT SPECIES. Asians and Whites are still both Homo Sapiens. The production of the lion-tiger hybrid would, in addition, only threaten the lion and tiger population if they began competed which obviously will not happen since they are only produced in zoos.

In conclusion, your argument makes no sense because the production of hybrids REDUCES genocidal tendencies, creates, for the most part, BETTER, individuals, and only in certain cases endangers the original parent species. This is all well, however, because if we hadn't outcompeted our parent species, we wouldn't even have been able to have this argument, could we?

Answer 5

Lions and tigers are genetically incapapble of mating, without human interferance.

I don't like your attitude. Instead of looking at it as "races dying" why don't you think about it in terms of "new races forming"? The United States has no "culture" of its own, instead it has an amalgum of other cultures, none of which are dead. The United States didn't kill culture, it developed its own.

Think about it in terms of linguistic change, if you will. Two languages come into contact with each other and borrow characteristics. Grammar changes, eventually a new vocabulary forms. People get outraged that the language is dying or being corrupted, but it's not. It's just changing. English is heavily influenced by French, for example. Before the Norman Conquest in 1066, the English Language was heavily Germanic. Think Beawolf. With the inclusion of French, our grammar became much more similar to Latin strucuture, and evolved to be what it is today.

The same thing applies to all forms of human contact, including racial contact. Things are always changing, some things end, some new things start. I'd lay off the "Mein Kampf" and eugenics if I were you, sweetie.

You seem a mite bit closed minded. Try lightning up and appreciating the beauty of hummanity, rather than that of individual races.

Answer 6

obviously you're on here for a bit of race hating and want to start an argument so i'll keep it brief. Lions and Tigers are not suitable as an analogy to 'races' in humans. Mixed race children do have an identity - they can identify any way they choose and it's people like you who confuse the issue.

Answer 7

First of all, while it is true that mixing of races dilutes the purity of any one race, do you really think this is something you should want to outlaw or prevent?

If two people want to marry and mix, that is their business.

There is no reason why people can't preserve the languages, cultures, foods, clothing, and customs of a race that they are part of just because they are not 'pure'.

We have no right to impose values of purity on others who want to marry other races...so there is little you can do about it anyway, even if you think it will wipe out a race. It is up to them to marry their own, or not, as they see fit. IF they prefer someone of their own race, that's OK too -- they are not racists necessarily.

I am 100% Italian but if I were of marrying type/age, I'd not care what the race was of the other person.

Answer 8

There are fewer American Indians because Europeans tried to exterminate them.

The children of blended unions are confused because prejudiced adults treat them like crap for no reason.

Romantic relations between ANY consenting adults is not unnatural; it is indeed very natural.

While we're at it, maybe you should be made aware that Sicily itself is a combination of many tribes, invaded by Greece, then Rome, then Arabs, then Northern Europeans....the list just goes on...you yourself are the result of various races blending together.

Answer 9

What you said amkes sense, in a way. You see, the reason there are so few NAtive Americans is because they died, not from breeding.

The breeding happend with the Spanish and the Aztec. This caused a new race/ethinic group, Mexicans. You see, if we all interbreed, we wont lose our culture and race, we will al be one. We will have a new culture.

I personaly think that would be bad. We all need our own cultures to be unique. I think it is ok for different races to date, but if it happens too much, that would be bad. Love who you want to love! I just hope that you love the same race...

Answer 10

Good then everyone would be mixed and racism would start to decrease. I have dated guys outside of my race and it was great, there's nothing wrong with it. By the way we are all in the same species so how is that unnatural.

Answer 11

I think that you may very well be the stupidest person to ever walk the earth. What you are saying makes no sense. It would be better if you didn't have any children. If you do never fear! Your children's "identity" will be intact! Since IQ is hereditary and since you must think that what you wrote is "real smart" you must be pretty close to the bottom of the food chain. Your child's "identity" will be either dumbest guy who is not ACTUALLY retarded or perhaps smartest retarded guy in the special ed class! Good for you!