2006-12-05 14:44:54 · 9 answers · asked by ROCHELLE B 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
What kind of dumba$$ question is this?
2006-12-05 14:46:37 · answer #1 · answered by go_uva 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Yes!!!!!!!!
Or maybe you have to be more clear on your question. If she has the child that is sick and needs the money for that child, and the child that she is paying on is healthy. She would have to get a court order to stop making payments but she still needs to pay, she had the child.
2006-12-05 14:46:11 · answer #2 · answered by JM 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes of course so if she is ordered to do so. However, she may seek a modification thru court or thru child support enforcement if she has extraordinary expenses for another child. For past due support she can argue equitable abattement.
2006-12-05 15:03:10 · answer #3 · answered by Unknown Oscillator 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes she still has a child
I would say the mother is the sick one.
2006-12-05 14:46:26 · answer #4 · answered by G L 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I wouldn't see why not! There is no reason any parent can reframe from paying child support because of a sickchild, that should give them more of a reason to assure their baby has a fullfilling life.
2006-12-05 14:47:05 · answer #5 · answered by Ali 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Whether the child is sick or well they still need to eat and they still need clothes on their backs and a place to live. Hell yea she gotta pay
2006-12-05 14:55:39 · answer #6 · answered by TBONE 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
heck yes you are insulting are intelligance, that child needs medical care if its sick and dying,you brought that life into the world what are you thinking?
2006-12-05 14:55:56 · answer #7 · answered by dee_ann 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, as a father who pay's (12 years now) and a representative for the 92% of MEN who pay
the answer is yes...
2006-12-05 14:47:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
yes.
2006-12-05 14:46:25 · answer #9 · answered by [?] 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋