2006-12-05 14:17:01 · 13 answers · asked by zztopspin 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
thats like picking which turd looks best in the cess pool ...
2006-12-05 14:20:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Rice
2006-12-05 14:19:59 · answer #2 · answered by J G 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
enable's settle for it: even the Republicans have been engaged on "replace." Fewer than one in 5 human beings think of we've been smart approximately our distant places coverage in the final seven years. Condileeza Rice spent that complete era as part of the distant places coverage-making group. If she's part of the value ticket, you may seem forward to the Democrats working classified ads claiming she spoke in prefer of alienating our allies. Which, once you seem at it, is exactly what we did in the run-as much as the Iraq invasion. while quiet international family members grow to be necessary to cajole Turkey to enable the 4th id by using, we've been telling each television group that would desire to take heed to that we've been bribing the Turks. (p.c. to piss off a Turkish government professional? enable him hear you telling persons you're bribing him. If he's a choose, no longer only will you no longer get what you p.c., you would be seeing precisely what info the Greeks have been given superb, and incorrect, in hour of darkness exhibit.) while the President's father confident the French to deliver the full distant places Legion in 'ninety-ninety one, this time around we insulted them on international television. the comparable is going for extremely nearly another best buddy; out of the 32 international locations which sent 956,600 troops to the 'ninety Gulf conflict (including classic enemies like Syria, Czechoslovokia, Hungary and Poland), only 10 international locations and a couple of mercenary companies sent 263,000 troops in 2003.
2016-10-14 02:55:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What would you rather eat?
Rotton Apples or Rotton Oranges?
I would vote Barack Obama
but if I had to choose, Condoleeza
2006-12-05 15:30:19 · answer #4 · answered by Master John 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no difference in the two. The same people who control the Bush administration would also control the hypothetical Rice administration.
2006-12-05 14:23:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Neither. Both scare me. Clinton/Obama in 08.
2006-12-05 16:23:59 · answer #6 · answered by Blonde Ambition 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um, let's see. They are both Republican and they both think they are white. Lesser of two evils would be at least to put a woman in the spot.
2006-12-05 14:26:40 · answer #7 · answered by yafetweka 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Condi, without question.
2006-12-05 14:19:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
neither...i would rather have Kim Jong
Kim and Condi..don't they make nice couple??
2006-12-05 14:23:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anwar h 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
id rather move to canada
2006-12-05 14:21:57 · answer #10 · answered by bush deathgrip 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋