English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

explain in detail

2006-12-05 13:20:01 · 5 answers · asked by ddub 1 in Arts & Humanities History

5 answers

This is a fairly complicated question. He brought order and stability to a society that was still reeling from the Reign of Terror and the other excesses of the French Revolution. He was also wildly efficient.

The question that follows from this is not why they accepted him at first but why they continued to accept him, especially as he returned to a state of personal rule which the Revolution had ended and he did not establish much economic stability. He succeeded in battle and made it appear as though the rest of Europe was the aggressor and he was only defending France by continuing warfare.

2006-12-05 14:33:02 · answer #1 · answered by Monica 3 · 0 0

Political experiments in France, made instantly after 1789, had been unsuccessful and those ended in chaos and confusion. The Revolutionary leaders struck terror within the minds of folks by way of arbitrary arrests and executions. They despatched their political enemies and all suspects to the guillotine or to jail.. Common folks, so terrorised, yearned for balance and order. The effect used to be the construction of a kind of presidency referred to as the Directory. The ousting of the Bourbons and status quo of the Republic weren't applicable to the predominantly monarchical Europe. They vowed to finish the republic and repair the Bourbons to energy. Their enemies entered into France. While the Directory wavered, it used to be the Army underneath Napoleon that defeated the enemies in all battles and stored the Republic. Napoleon's victories made him incredibly preferred. The stupid executive of the Directory made it incredibly unpopular. The effect used to be preferred aid to any degree proposed through Napoleon. Napoleon proposed the dissolution of the Directory and its substitute through a Consulate of 3 with himself because the First Consul. His persisted victories in battles and effective management made him the chief of his folks. He used to be adored and revered. Though defeated finally, he used to be on no account unpopular along with his possess folks.

2016-09-03 11:55:30 · answer #2 · answered by sykes 4 · 0 0

For the same reason that Germany accepted Hitler, we accepted Bush. It seemed like a breath of fresh air after all the wrongs commited on them by previous governments.

2006-12-05 13:50:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

firstly he killed any trouble makers, secondly he seized power using the army, thirdly he defeated the armies invading France, he solved at least in the short run Frances financial difficulty, he created a new system of law and restored national pride. basically he brought order out of chaos and subdued anyone who rebelled.

2006-12-05 23:54:49 · answer #4 · answered by supremecritic 4 · 0 0

the french thought he had fresh new ideas and that he would help them when he really brought their empire to the ground!

2006-12-05 14:29:08 · answer #5 · answered by Random is my passion 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers