English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ok this is something I have been very curious about for a while. I have an example before I give the question.

If I was to have a wireless LAN up and running, broadcasting an SSID, but I left the network UNencrypted, yet having some type of MAC address logging software installed on the router...

If someone came buy and started downloading illegal content, who would be at fault. The person providing the unencrypted internet access, or the person downloading the illegal content (whose mac address was recorded, AND NOT SPOOFED).

This question is about not me, please don't e-mail with any hate mail or for any other reason other than to answer the question.

I'm talking legally of course

2006-12-05 11:57:53 · 5 answers · asked by D 4 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

Also say I have a packet analyazer installed on the router, and I can prove HE downloaded it.

2006-12-05 12:07:18 · update #1

5 answers

Using someone else's wireless network is illegal. The person who owns the network would not be at fault. It is called "war driving" primarily in reference to people driving around with laptops parking on the street and using someone's signal. It is good to at least setup 128 bit WEP. The best out there now is WPA, mac address filtering, and turning off the SSID. Most gaming consoles only accept WEP since encryption slows down gameplay. A serious code cracker could break the WEP, but chances are he/she will pick some other more vulnerable target. It is amazing how many open networks are around in residential, suburban neighborhoods.

2006-12-06 01:32:56 · answer #1 · answered by Thundercat 7 · 0 0

hi, susceptible WiFi signal somewhat skill you've a "susceptible" "signal" " not some thing in any respect to do with human beings sharing a line. It only skill precisely what it says you've a susceptible signal. like even as gazing television in the journey that your aerial is interior the incorrect position you get a susceptible signal. so that you're literally not connecting to the router at this is optimum %. If this is totally susceptible and also you're right down to assert a 1Meg connection for your router then some thing that you do can in elementary words bypass on the speed you connect including your router as an try, plug in through a community cable... if it is going faster then this is down for your prompt connection and also you want to both get your prompt router out of the cupboard, sit down in the route of it or get yet another prompt router piggy sponsored from the first one in the route of your position.

2016-11-30 04:48:53 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I think it would be the person who downloads the illegal content. If you know that it is happening, and you did not contact or provide the information to the authorities then you could be charges as an accessory to the crime.

2006-12-05 12:02:02 · answer #3 · answered by JackieCakes 2 · 0 0

The question is, why have it unencripted? unless you are using it is a restaurant or some place you want to give others access. Downloading from someones computer is illegal; proving it is something else

2006-12-05 12:06:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i guess the one who sneaking on your network is "socially" the bad guy, but you are wrong for not password protecting your network b/c you clearly know you should be. But even if you left your front door unlocked and someone came in a took all your stuff they would still be charged with larceny. I think the internet company probably has a usage/responsibility policy and you probably broke that. I dunno.

2006-12-05 12:10:16 · answer #5 · answered by CoCoKauai 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers