English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

what do you think about cultural tradition and modern technology

2006-12-05 11:31:10 · 3 answers · asked by mehdiay 1 in Social Science Sociology

3 answers

I think both tradition and technology are very good servants but bad masters. It's just as stupid to reject a good idea because it's old as because it's new. My great-aunt's objections to "newfangled" Internet genealogy are just as silly as the opinion that nuclear power is better than other fuels because it's new.

As far as specifically cultural tradition--that depends on exactly what tradition you're talking about. These things have to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. For example, respect for your elders is a great thing in moderation, but when you get to the point where nobody under forty can get an opinion listened to, it's gone too far.

Tradition and technology are really not opposed to each other. We need our traditions, our basis in the past, to provide a solid foundation for the building and innovation of the future.

2006-12-05 11:54:58 · answer #1 · answered by telcontar328 2 · 0 0

“I marvel what well Indian ceremonies can do in opposition to the health problem which comes from their wars, their bombs, their lies?” (132) Ever considering the Europeans landed within the New World within the 15th century, there was a clashing of Native American and white cultures. The whites unfold new sicknesses, had been subconscious of the spirit of nature, and taken new state-of-the-art science, like swords and weapons. The cultures were at odds considering; from this tradition conflict built the quandary of culture as opposed to modernity, ancient as opposed to new tradition. This crisis is obvious in Ceremony, by means of Leslie Marmon Silko, a unique approximately the battle of the combined race protagonist, Tayo, to reconcile his opposing Native American and white cultures. Tayo need to include the Native American traditions of affection, group, admire for nature, and non-violence as he's faced by means of the white state-of-the-art suggestions of drunkenness, poverty, battle, sexism, racism, and greed. He is pressured to take on the clash among the conventional tradition of the Laguna Pueblo tribe and the state-of-the-art white tradition. Silko turns out to feel that a fusion of the culture and state-of-the-art cultures is critical, no longer easily adopting one or the opposite. Tayo is enveloped within the Indian/white battle of culture as opposed to modernity. The tale the reader encounters is satiated with this crisis to rectify the diversities. But the reader can best get thus far, for the reader is reminded that the unconventional is written in English and the tale is supposed to be within the ancient dialect, as so much of it takes location within the Laguna Pueblo, wherein English isn't continuously spoken. The ancient medication guy Ku’oosh explains to Tayo that within the Laguna Pueblo language “no phrase exists on my own, and the purpose for opting for every phrase needed to be defined with a tale approximately why it need to be stated this targeted approach” (35). The reader is left inaccessible and uncomfortable as to this hole among the conventional Laguna Pueblo language and the state-of-the-art English. Tayo additionally feels uncomfortable together with his opposing cultures as he attempts to opt for one over the opposite......................................

2016-09-03 11:59:53 · answer #2 · answered by lil 4 · 0 0

They blend quite nicely together. Have you read andthing about post modernism. It is a contradiction in terms but absolutely fascinating.

2006-12-05 11:45:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers