English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-05 10:26:29 · 31 answers · asked by Lick my @sss 1 in News & Events Current Events

The Queen: 'I know knight you Sir Bush the Bozo'

2006-12-05 10:29:17 · update #1

31 answers

Only if he makes a BIG loan to the govt.


And that's the first time in my entire life I've seen the word 'does' with an apostrophe in it - a first indeed!

:o)

2006-12-05 10:29:06 · answer #1 · answered by migdalski 7 · 1 0

Deserves a knighthood for being brave in the face of strategic information that is 20 years ahead of current thinking, and taking it on the chin. As far as current day thinking is concerned, there's the bozo theory. But, strategics don't deal with just today.Or 2006 perceptions. Without going into details, implications for politicians are bad, they cannot win with PR. That they are not allowed to disclose reasons for many many things and we can speculate for all our worth about how bad/good/stupid it is, without slightly touching the forecast implications for the world in 2026. Best Wishes.

2006-12-05 18:52:33 · answer #2 · answered by Thx 4 All The Fish 2 · 0 1

Heck no, but Tony Blair does for being an even bigger dumbass than Bush, and hopefully the Queen's hand would slip and decapitate the ****. Lets face it, there's more of a chance this happens then the prat quitting office.

2006-12-05 18:37:47 · answer #3 · answered by zarda786 4 · 2 0

He's certainly worthy of a "dumbass knighthood"....but as long as Hillary Clinton is alive, he's not the biggest dumbass in modern history.

2006-12-05 18:52:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sir Dubyah Dumbass

2006-12-05 18:35:15 · answer #5 · answered by Wren 3 · 6 1

I don't know if he is the biggest dumbass in modern history, for there are a few. And I don't think the Queen is so cleaver to say such a thing-Prince Harry is cleaver, not his grandmother.

2006-12-05 18:50:42 · answer #6 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 1 0

He should get many things...electroshock therapy, couseling for failing to take his schizophrenia meds, several specific gunshots to the lower extremeties...but I believe a knighthood for anything would be too gratifying, even if it's for being the biggest effer alive.

2006-12-05 19:57:46 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I'm sure he does! Although he's probably done what he thinks best in terms of his country and religion/beliefs, he has probably done more to set back the world opinion of America than anyone in history. I acknowledge that this is my own personal viewpoint, and apologise to any reading this who think he's the top dog, but he doesn't actually seem to have accomplished anything more than to show that being a world leader doesn't mean that you have to have intelligence! Although I'm sure Tony Blair is right up there with him.

2006-12-05 18:43:13 · answer #8 · answered by Sarah W 2 · 2 1

I would suport any award for George W as long as it included a two week camping holiday in North Korea or Iran

2006-12-06 04:44:07 · answer #9 · answered by Reg Tedious 4 · 0 0

Only people getting knighted are the ones paying the Labour government huge amounts of money.

2006-12-05 18:44:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers