English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-05 09:52:04 · 4 answers · asked by stephanie h 1 in Family & Relationships Marriage & Divorce

4 answers

Don't do this. I married a wonderful man that I do not have passion for. I did not realize that there was more to it than what we have -- we are best friends who have great sex and now have two children. But I finally realize that what you need to be happy in a romantic relationship is that intangible connection where you get butterflies when you see them and you are each others' first priority. Without that relationships are very difficult and unlikely to be successful.

Good luck.

2006-12-05 10:00:21 · answer #1 · answered by I'm Trying 3 · 1 0

Depends on what you mean by "convenience". Passion is not everything, and I will gladly forgo passion in exchange for love, loyalty and committment. And yes, it IS more "convenient" to be in a loving and loyal relationship than in a passionate one. Passion is great in the short term, but love and loyalty win in the long-term.

2006-12-05 18:58:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Most people settle - they just dont get it. The said thing is when they finally find that one its to late.

2006-12-05 18:23:51 · answer #3 · answered by Redhead 2 · 0 0

Not me.

2006-12-05 17:59:49 · answer #4 · answered by ♥ Butterfly ♥ 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers