Should men have a say or just live with the decision of the women only as far as saving the babies life. (Right now men have no rights in this situation)
Yet If a women decides to have it the man is obligated to support the baby. (No rights again) What do you think double standard?
2006-12-05 09:22:57 · 14 answers · asked by Tony B 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Well yes they should have "Some" rights and I do say only some. I mean it is his too. It does take two, but with that in mined, they should think very thoroughly before having sex, because the man, as well as the woman, know that pregnancy is a possibility when you have sex, so if he wants rights, about an abortion decision, on if she should keep it or not. You have the right first and for most not to participate in intercourse. There for if a pregnancy does occur and he does not want it but she does, well he had the right to begin with, not to have sex in the fist place. I believe that part is called "RESPONSIBILITY" not "RIGHTS" like I said I "It takes two"
Thank you :-)
2006-12-05 09:40:57 · answer #1 · answered by Alexandra Solano 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First and foremost, I believe that the two consenting adults should discuss proper birth control prior to getting intimate with one another.
However, I definitely believe a man should have a say on his child's life that is in the mother's womb. Absolutely! I think it is wrong for a woman to assume that the father has no say in the situation at all since she (and the government) will expect him to support this child once it has emerged. It doesn't matter that the woman carries the baby for 9 or 10 months - what matters is the LIFE the baby will have after it is born. She did not make that baby by herself!
It is a standard, by which I am surprised enough men have not rallied together to make it "their right."
2006-12-05 09:30:36 · answer #2 · answered by terryoulboub 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If the proper steps were taken to begin with this would not even be a discussion. I know that abstanence is the only sure fire way to prevent pregancy but there are still alot of people out here who are carelessly having sex and then when she pops up pregnant every one is standing around talking about 'now what' true it is a womans body but that has nothing to do with the child that is inside of her whose life and or future is dependent on two morons who can only think about what they want or whats best for them. For the MEN, if you dont want to take responsibility for a child then keep your dic*k in your pants. And women take whatever steps to ensure that the odds of you getting pregnant is to your advantage. and stop sleeping with men who dont care about you cause if they cared about you they wouldnt have a problem taking care of you and his child. If you get pregnant and dont want the baby but he does then have the child and give him 100 percent custody. So what if your body is out of shape for nine months, you'll get over it and maybe think twice b4 spreading your legs.
2006-12-05 09:41:54 · answer #3 · answered by Thumper 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
it is not any longer the right to abortion, in line with se, as a lot because the right of someone female to assert what takes position to her own body. you're saying that someone must be able to be compelled to carry a baby to time period and provides you delivery to it, and he or she might want to haven't any say? imagine of it this kind. If I walked as a lot as you and demanded that you supply me one among your kidneys, you would tell me the position to bypass, because it is your body and that i have no agency making those style of demands on it. it is the right to administration one's own body, and to privateness that makes abortion something that would want to no longer be banned, no longer the right to the abortion itself. might want to such a range of of persons opt for it to proceed to be criminal if a guy had a say in it? i'm no longer effective what distinction that can make. Are you suggesting that a guy must be allowed to call for an abortion if he would not opt for to be a father? in the different case, how is giving a guy the right to veto a lady's determination and use her body as his own own resources any different than banning or limiting it? Your difficulty would not quite make a lot experience. How about attempting this one on for length. If adult men had to carry a baby instead of the girl, and had to bypass with the help of being pregnant and puzzling paintings like women human beings do, do you imagine, for a second, that there might want to also be a communicate about abortion being the own determination of the fellow who's pregnant? To sum up: convinced, i imagine adult men must have equivalent abortion rights. Any guy who's with new child also should be able to make certain even if he is going to carry that child to time period and provides you delivery, or no longer. allow me understand at the same time as which will change into correct.
2016-11-23 18:44:47 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No they shouldn't bc they aren't the one carrying the child for 9 months and half of the time the man that impregnated the woman is basically a sperm donor simply bc he won't be in the child's life and then the woman is left on her own raising the child herself.
2006-12-05 09:27:52 · answer #5 · answered by beauty 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes,because its not just the girls decision to make,maybe the guy wants to have the baby he can try to talk her into not having the abortion.
2006-12-05 09:27:43 · answer #6 · answered by Brittany Lynn 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
like everything else it depends on the situration... i have had one abortion ... i actually wanted to keep the baby but at the time i was going through a deep depression and my partner at the time was a complete AZZ he actually had his mother pay for it
about 8 months later he said he did want to have a child.... then a month later he didnt (he was bi-polar) but i was pregnant we broke up and i kept my baby... and no i do not request or want any support from him
2006-12-05 09:33:36 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
well in this situation where after marriage the couple are meant to share the deeds it shud b like if the women is week then its the man's duty go4 abortion. Otherwise it is better to their decisions.
2006-12-05 09:30:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
no it should be womens choice shes the one carrying it 4 9 months unless the guy is telling her its wrong and to have the baby
2006-12-05 09:24:30 · answer #9 · answered by jts #1fan 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
when and if a man is able to endure 9 months of pregnancy and go through labour THEN he should be entitled to a say in the matter.. and NOT until then!!! And.. as for the argument of him having to support the baby.. guess what?? she didn't impregnate herself!
2006-12-05 09:28:05 · answer #10 · answered by puresatin 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋