the games which barely reach 20 frames on the celeron, reach up to 50 frames on the pentium 4. Is this possible? I mean is the performace difference this much for these two cpus or is it something other that is affecting the performance. All the other settings are the same
2006-12-05
07:47:35
·
7 answers
·
asked by
the.chosen.one
3
in
Computers & Internet
➔ Hardware
➔ Desktops
video card is nvidia 6600 gt
and ram is 1gb ddr
2006-12-05
07:56:36 ·
update #1
i mean all the other components are the same, that is video card, ram, hard disks etc.
when i change the cpu and mobo the difference comes
2006-12-05
08:26:44 ·
update #2
The Celeron is the biggest marketing fiasco to hit ever. The ONLY difference between a Celeron and full blood regular chip is the Celeron has been stripped of the precious internal memory cache. This cache is what makes the chip more efficient and process data faster. Yes, the 3Ghz chip does run faster, but it is not nearly as efficient as the P4 2.4Ghz in handling data.
Think of it as putting a large engine in a tiny car. The engine is technically faster, but the small transmission and wheel base of the car prohibit it from moving as fast as it should.
2006-12-05 07:54:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Celerons are an entry level CPU. But the differences in video subsystems almost certainly come into play. Frame rate is more related to the video system than the CPU. And a PC with a Celeron CPU is more likely to have a low performance video card as well. You didn't give the video specs so I can't say for sure what the exact cause is. Ditto for system RAM.
2006-12-05 07:52:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bostonian In MO 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are many other factors besides CPU speed that determine how fast a computer runs. The amount and type of RAM, the amount of Video RAM, type of video chipset just to name a few. It's not suprising that the Pentium 4 runs faster than the Celeron.
2006-12-05 07:58:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by bpwahlgren 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Celerons simply suck for games, a clock speed of a processor only matters when you are comparing it to processors of the same type. Every processor has a different architecture which ultimately decides it's performance, clock speed means nothing.
A Pentium 4 is just simply alot better than a Celeron.
2006-12-05 07:52:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dem 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well it's not only the CPU clock speed that you should be concerned with. You have to understand that when the manufacturer states it to be 2.4GHz that it is the "clock speed" they are measuring/estimating. It's the speed of the processor only and at perfect conditions.
Processors run substantially slower once you introduce the Motherboard, RAM, Video, Audio, etc., etc., etc.
For example: I have a 2.2GHz Sempron. It actually runs in the PC at 1.49GHz. That is because of the slow FSB (front side bus) and other hardware factors which slow down the cycles per second.
If you'd like to see what each of your CPU's are actually running at, go to this website and download and run their "Advisor" on each of your PC's.
http://www.belarc.com
Hope this helps.
2006-12-05 07:57:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by Dick 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I on no account concept i could say this, in spite of the incontrovertible fact that the celeron could be quicker. easily something that runs on shrink than an 800 MHz FSB should not be mentioned as a P4 as properly. the quicker FSB skill you will study and write on your RAM quicker. the greater valuable clock velocity skill you will calculate quicker. yet, you modern-day-day RAM (that's of course working at 4 hundred MHz on the main) ought to no longer be speedy sufficient to run at 533 MHz.... So there could be a hidden value there. in case you ought to purchase ram too, i could propose going with a P4 prescott. I pricewatched them no longer too in the previous (SMK superstore replaced into the main low priced), and 3.4GHz mobo-cpu mixtures have been in basic terms particularly over $one hundred, and that they are very overclockable regardless of inventory cooling. i visit assure that a three.4 prescott could weigh down the celeron at an identical time as that's composed of basic overall performance. as quickly as you're upgrading you would be waiting to as appropriate pass optimum bang on your greenback.
2016-12-18 07:56:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by salgueiro 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Processors are different. Performance is not based on clock speed. And maybe your video card is slow too
2006-12-05 07:51:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Grant A 2
·
0⤊
0⤋