English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I am really not sure, because I thought it was a terrorist attack but then John Conner said that it was actually from Ppresident Bush because he payed people to do it so he could declare war. I don't know what to think because I just can't see our President killing all those people, and I need your opinions. What do you guys think??

2006-12-05 06:12:21 · 23 answers · asked by Invisible Star 2 in Politics & Government Politics

Quote: "John Conner? Wasn't he the son of Sarah Conner, the woman that The Terminator was sent here to kill?" I don't know about the terminators victims, but if you want to talk to himn yourself go to: http://www.theresistancemanifesto.com Also someone said that since John Conner makes says it it has to be true, and I don't have my own opinion, Eh... WRONG. I do have my own opinion, I am just having second thoughts about it due to the fact that a lot of people claim there are 'facts' backing up the incident that George did it.
no I should not be arested for treason just because I am asking people's opinions on the matter. Besides it is a free country, and I like Bush but even if I didn't I could yell it to the sky and NOT be arested for Treason because it is called freedom of speach, and 'type'. Now stop critizising, I just want answers not insults! Gosh.

2006-12-06 09:38:16 · update #1

23 answers

President Bush is a good person who has been falsely demonized by his political enemies. The people claiming that our government somehow was involved are a bunch of nutcases. they need to re-adjust their tinfoil beenies.
http://zapatopi.net/afdb/build.html

When will they finally figure out that radical islam want us islamic or DEAD. No compromise.

quote:
"Those who stay in America should be open to society without melting, keeping Mosques open so anyone can come and learn about Islam. If you choose to live here, you have a responsibility to deliver the message of Islam ... Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faiths, but to become dominant. The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth." - Omar Ahmad Co-founder of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)

http://www.news.faithfreedom.org/gallery2/v/ffi_gallery/cult_of_domination/jihadtriple.jpg.html

2006-12-05 06:30:46 · answer #1 · answered by boonietech 5 · 4 1

John Conner? Wasn't he the son of Sarah Conner, the woman that The Terminator was sent here to kill?

2006-12-05 06:37:20 · answer #2 · answered by Fred C. Dobbs 4 · 2 0

attending to the information will require an open and honest self sustaining study. The 9-11 fee change right into a sham. The households of 9-11 victims, and the american human beings, deserve finished disclosure. Polls tutor a majority of people have self belief that the authorities isn't being straightforward about the activities of 9/11. that isn't to point that the final public have self belief the authorities change into fullyyt responsible - even if the final public do have self belief the authorities isn't coming sparkling with the information. The style of mind-blowing coincidences one ought to settle for to purchase the reputable tale is startling. We purely does no longer settle for that degree of coincidence as fact in different parts of existence, which contain a courtroom of regulation, as an example. So why are we prepared to settle for mind-blowing coincidences about an experience that has formed the theory of overseas and relatives contributors coverage the following and international wide for the previous seven years? in all danger, we are able to under no circumstances understand each of the information with fact, yet an self sustaining study will actual help sparkling up many of the outstanding questions. //EDIT. LOL in any respect those posters who attempt to color those who mistrust the "reputable tale" as "liberal". I absolutely have information for them ... I absolutely have many contacts in my Yahoo solutions contacts who disbelieve the "reputable tale" and the final public of those human beings are REPUBLICANS. Get a grip! seeing that at the same time as is it "liberalism" to comprehend your accountability to question your authorities and carry it responsible?

2016-11-23 18:24:00 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

one point will clear that up. If the president was willing to kill 3000 people for a cause dont you think he would kill anyone that says he did it?


these people can make connection after connection. business man do just that business. To think he wouldnt have had some contact with some of the biggest businessman and companys in the world that had interests in the WTC would be idiotic but then again so is the idea he did it sooo..........

2006-12-05 06:28:47 · answer #4 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 3 0

Are you serious? No Bush did not have a hand in 9/11. What lead to 9/11 was failure of the former administration to take action when the terrorist struck the USS Cole, the marine barracks, and The embassy during their rule. They are not the only problem though, just like the bombing of Pearl Harbor the signs were there and the enemy was spotted but it was misinterpreted.

2006-12-05 06:18:40 · answer #5 · answered by joevette 6 · 5 2

Well........if John Conner said it, it must be true. Start spending more time looking into the FACTS instead of waiting around for other people to tell you what to think and maybe someday you'll have an opinion of your own.

2006-12-05 06:25:09 · answer #6 · answered by Jeremy 2 · 5 1

No. We have media proof he was having Butter Cookies and Milk with a group of 8 year olds at school when it happened. From what I saw on CNN it looked like he was due for nap time.

Now, this could mean Dick Cheney was in charge at the time and we all know from the media he'll shoot at anything that looks like a bird...

2006-12-05 06:43:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

We cant really say it was Bush's idea or even his orders to execute 9-11,because like someone said before Bush is an incompetent, he lacks the intelligence and foresight to understand what a catalyst 9-11 could be for a people supported war and therefore PROFITS could be made.So therefore there are definitely players behind the scenes who are guiding the president and making things happen. I could go on and on but one things for sure 9-11 is a self-inflicted wound, Its the same ploy Hitler used back in world war 2 by bombing the German Parliament then what happened Hitler became Fuhrer with complete military control with the support of the people. And dont get me wrong I am a patriot that loves this country and what this country used to stand for, now because of our idiot in charge we are being led into pointless wars, losing our liberties day by day, and closer and closer to an economic crash. Open your eyes- FREEPRESSINTERNATIONAL.

2006-12-05 07:06:19 · answer #8 · answered by truthbetold 1 · 0 4

John Conner seems to know what he is talking about. I saw a youtube video of him passing out "9/11 inside job" DVDs at UCSD. He interviewed one of the Professors who backed up his beliefs. I myself have done a little research on the subject; what I found is almost unbelievable: Sad for sure.

Most all the evidence that is available to us, show that the WTC buildings were rigged with explosives. Our own government had motive as was well as an opportunity to do this crime. Here is the evidence, presented for your scrutiny.

FAKE CONFESSION
The official government story is that the 9/11 attack was orchestrated by Al Qaeda, which is lead by Osama bin Laden. The proof our government provided was a video with Osama confessing to the crime. The problem with the video is that the person in the video does not look like Osama bin Laden: See picture.
http://911blimp.net/vid_fakeOsamaVideo.shtml
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk519bkcLjg

EVIDENCE
There are many other factors that do not fit the official story. They include, secondary explosions that were seen, heard, reported, and recorded by firefighters, in and around the WTC buildings.
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4574366633014832928&q=firefighter+bombs+in+the+building
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcRs1fv8i3I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHz9YWVgJWM

Here is a video clip showing a trail of explosions just before the destruction wave.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_DkzhonpGY&mode=related&search=

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid. Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ

FORENSICS
A chemical analysis of the solidified molten iron,conducted by independent firms, yielded an explosive, called Thermite. Also found was a WTC core beam; most probably cut using the demolition cutting charge (Thermate). No core beams were left standing beyond a few feet high, for it to have been cut by an Iron Workers torch. Click on pic. to enlarge.
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2006/06/341238.shtml

CONFESSION
We also have a video recording, where owner Larry Silverstein, admits to demolishing WTC7.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7750532340306101329

TESTIMONY
There is also a problem with the Pentagon attack. Listen to this retired general, He says, "The Plane does not fit the hole; so what did hit the Pentagon..."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2VoUN-7RVU&eurl=

This video, obtained by a public interest group, shows the top rear fin of an air craft hiding behind a call box: Whatever is hiding back there, is under 48 ft. long, too small to be a Boeing 757, which is over 155 ft. long.
http://www.clipaday.com/2006/05/pentagon_plane_crash_from_sept.html

MOTIVE
The New Conservatives (Neo-Cons), with the help of their friends, started planning the invasion of Iraq, shortly after Pres. Bush took office. Apparently, the plan would include the attack of the WTC buildings. It did this to get the support of congress and the nation, to attack Iraq. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to get the ball rolling.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf

OPPORTUNITY
Witnesses saw a work crew going into the WTC buildings with rolls of wire, supposedly for internet upgrades. Tenants were moved around while crews "upgraded" the cable systems. The Port Authority cut power to the building for a whole weekend, just prior to the attack; shutting down the entire security systems. Witnesses also heard crews operating heavy hammering equipment that left a gray cement like dust, in the building. This activity took place just weeks before the 911 attack: The Port Authority had released control of the buildings to Larry Silverstein, six weeks prior to the attack: He made upwards of $5 billion off of the attack.
See "9/11 Mysteries" video: Time = 1:03:55 through 1:07:00 and 1:19:55 through 1:24:09
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6708190071483512003&q=911+mysteries&hl=en-CA

2006-12-05 23:44:10 · answer #9 · answered by Joe_Pardy 5 · 1 2

John Conner has an OPINION based on no facts. Don't believe that conspiracy stuff, it is as big of a hoax as recycling is.

2006-12-05 06:16:46 · answer #10 · answered by Abu 5 · 6 1

fedest.com, questions and answers