English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-05 05:52:14 · 3 answers · asked by t1gger210 1 in Social Science Economics

3 answers

yes,because its helps people focus on reall problems instead of t=rying to believe that someone can find something that they dont understan and find someyhing about it to be the cuase of a problem becuase they have something in common with something else,people that search for those think that alot of people think aboput something that they dont, like they were pre destined to be the person that accidentally found it for everyone because how else could someone make something like that up without knowing the effects on society first i mean if they want to just find out if their hypothisis is right

2006-12-05 06:59:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Yes,
Given that homosexual behavior is inherently unhealthy, there are direct costs including loss of productivity and shorter lifespans in the aggregate which must be absorbed by the majority of society that chooses less risky sexual activity, and further
Given that homosexual partnerships are not going to produce natural children plus are unstable platforms for raising productive and conscientious citizens, additional costs to society for loss of labor and increased mental health care, jail time and related support are going to increase.
The traditional family is in every way superior in every way to economic GDP.

2006-12-05 08:27:03 · answer #2 · answered by davidvario 3 · 0 0

In terms of public debate they generate, definitely. Economically, it is highly unlikely...

2006-12-05 06:11:56 · answer #3 · answered by NC 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers