The Democrats are constantly criticizing our military, either directly or indirectly . Direct criticism is obvious, but indirect criticism is not so obvious . When the Democrats criticize and HATE the President for 'slow' or 'lack of' progress... ........They are criticizing our military leadership, they're the ones who draw up the plans . And criticism is fine, but pure-Hatred is ridiculous . Do they somehow think that there's a 'magic pill' or 'miraculous solution' to the problem in Iraq ?
Do the Democrats somehow think our military is Infallible and God-Like ??? Sigh... . Give them a break and how about alot more CREDIT AND RESPECT ??
2006-12-05 05:33:24 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Nobody should think that. Perfection is not possible for mortals. No military is invincible.
The difference is that Republicans love & respect our military, while Dems hate our military & hold them in contempt.
2006-12-05 05:46:19 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 17⤊ 2⤋
I have not heard a single Democrat criticize the military. This question appears to start off with an untruth, or perhaps the asker is uninformed. Or both.
Disagreeing with the failed "stay the course" Bush policy is not the same as not supporting the military.
Or do you suggest that the incoming Secretary of State is criticizing the military? Does that make him a "libeal" too?
2006-12-05 05:37:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
I have democrat friends in the military.
And why do you generalize so much? Not all people are the same and you can't lump all people of one party into one idea. You really are a fool aren't you? You should take a break from the Political pages here, buddy. You don't seem to like healthy debate. All you want to do is criticize the other side and make yours look better.
2006-12-05 05:48:53 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
convinced. Conservatives have self belief in man or woman accountability. The structure change into written to keep up man or woman freedoms with the aid of holding the authorities small and proscribing its powers. the own sector is the engine of a sturdy economic gadget, no longer the authorities. If human beings can fend for themselves in honest paintings, they're chuffed to have the authorities out of their lives. It change into Eisenhower who all started college desegregation so minorities might want to get equivalent education. It change into Nixon who all started Affirmative action and finished desegregating the colleges to make effective minorities were given an equivalent shot in jobs and better education. also, with the aid of percentage, extra Republicans voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act than Democrats and a Republican wrote the law. each of the Democrats did change into provide welfare funds yet they did no longer something to lift the lives of minorities to keep up themselves for genuine freedom and equality. the way the welfare change into doled out destroyed their relatives structure which change into sturdy. This has brought about generational poverty. Poverty is time-honored with no dermis colour. At this element, the emphasis is on the international, no longer this usa. we are being further right down to apply our percentage of the resources meaning our high quality of existence will be like London contained in the 1800's with maximum persons being filled into great cities living in substandard highrise very small housing and rationed water, ability, and nutrition. Its occurring a lot speedier than i'd have theory a possibility. Consumerism is being performed away with with the aid of creating our maximum effortless needs very intense priced and discouraging new market that would not in superb condition into this style of destiny. Obama calls it wish and regulate. I call it, i'm satisfied i'm previous. Sustainable progression is why the Republcans are being deliberately destroyed.
2016-11-23 18:19:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush IS the military leadership, and everyone below him must remain in rank and apolitical. And it's good to hear that you guys finally think there is a problem in Iraq. Maybe now the strategists can adapt an appropriate plan. it might help if you guys got around to calling it a civil war, too, since that is ALSO good information to have when developing a strategy.
2006-12-05 05:48:27 · answer #5 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why are you being disingenuous? The military draw up the plans but have political masters. The failings as we have been told by many a retiring general has been the buffoon in the White House, and not our brave and highly professional military.
Left to them this mess would never have happened.
2006-12-05 05:38:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Oh my the level of insanity has now reached critical levels.
No one insults the military except in the head of conservatives who are unable to deal with reality.
The military follows orders.
WHY DID THEY NOT HAVE A PLAN BEFORE THEY INVADED?
2006-12-05 05:45:12 · answer #7 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
mostly, democratic liberals have NO respect for the military....neither they nor their children have ever served,
Most republican conservatives hold the opposite view and a greater number have served in the military which they see as an honorable endeavor.
2006-12-05 05:38:12 · answer #8 · answered by Chef Bob 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
It is not perfect, but there are no other militaries that can beat us and I cant complain.
2006-12-05 05:39:57 · answer #9 · answered by Daniel 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's a work in progress, not perfect.
2006-12-05 14:07:56 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋