Do you think OJ was innocent?

Answer 1

oj is innocent, nuff said

Answer 2

OJ has always maintained his innocence and his recent hypothetical book should be available and people have a CHOICE whether to read it or not. OJ is likely not being narcissistic and a great portion of the book is probably defending himself against false allegations. Here's a few things that the jury may have considered:
-The investigator who found the glove later committed PERJURY regarding his extreme racist comments.
- Another investigator took a vial sample of OJ's blood from the lab and carried it INTO the crime scenes.
- The glove DID NOT fit OJ's hand (wrong size).
- There never was the amount of blood on OJ's body, clothes, house or car CONSISTENT with someone who had committed that crime in person..
- The murder weapon was NEVER connected to him or found.
- The jury was taken to visit OJ's house and DID NOT see the rumored large blood trail.
- There were no witnesses to the actual crime.
Likely the jury found him innocent because there was a LACK of real evidence to convict.
Some may disagree with the verdict but it's unfair for them to say with absolute certainty that this man is guilty.
Read this:
http://members.aol.com/CntrbndMag/oj.html
One of the World's top forensics scientists Dr. Henry Lee who worked on the case during the trial and saw the evidence, wrote a very good book "Cracking Cases" and makes some interesting points about OJ not being the one who did this unfortunate crime.

Answer 3

the evidence states otherwise--anyway for all the people who keep saying he wrote the book, IT WASN'T HIS IDEA DO ANYONE READ THE NEWS? he didn't even write that material someone else did, they just wanted his name on it and of course him being the jackass he is he didn't care he needed the money he got paid before the book was even announced to the public. He didn't write the book--it was a publishing company that won' t identify themselves and it had a ghost rider, but they had to sell it and using OJ name would bring the publicity they needed, the book sold 15,000 on an ebay auction i think it just got shut down. He was found not guilty because the prosecutors screwed up alot, but from his personality he seems like he is capable of murder, I met him in person and he is for sure a jackass!

Answer 4

Definitely, or Police Squad and Frank Drebbin would have found the evidence. And why all this bother over OJ, William Shatner MAY have killed 2 wives, yet noone bitches him.

Answer 5

I suggest using Aachen's Razor i.e. all things being equal the most logical conclusion is the correct one.
You have to believe one of two things to be true here.
1) A man who has a history of domestic violence and serious control issues snapped and murdered his estranged wife, and then killed a possible witness.
2) The entire Los Angeles' police department and forensics labs worked together to frame a beloved sports hero and thus allow a real killer to go free.

Answer 6

Uh, yeah. Just kidding. OJ doesn't even thinkn he's innocent. :) Well, he may have convinced himself of his own lies by now, but no way is that dude innocent. Lucky though, I'll say that. Although, he may be living his own personal hell hopefully. I bet he's dreading the day he dies. Flames of hell aren't really something to look forward to.

Answer 7

Do pigeons poop on statues? Do bears poop in the woods, are rain forrest's being depleated, Does the poe wear a funny hat? UMMMMM HECK YES!

Answer 8

I ask you this and you will know my answer. If you were innocent would you write a book called
"IF I DID IT"? NO he was guilty as hell

Answer 9

Is the pope Jewish? But, I bet he gets his with all the people who speak freely about him being guilty. He is the only one walking around in a lie. He has created a hell on earth.

Answer 10

No, I don't think he was/is innocent. He should have went to prison to rot.