You are looking again at the facts,you gotta listen to the words when dealing with Bush.
If you look logically at the facts of course that's not believable by any standard.
2006-12-05 04:15:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by justgoodfolk 7
·
7⤊
6⤋
Bush is just part of a dynasty that is attempting to self perpetuate. I am thinking Bush Jr may well have ended and put paid to Bush Srs future dreams of appointing Jeb next. Naturally he would have his people in Jrs. administration.
2006-12-05 13:20:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
i in my view have self belief that to care about any personality, they opt to have perfect flaws, no longer purely something that works contained in the characters favour (like clumsiness, because it can make the nature look amazing). even if, mutually, characters with too many flaws get on my nerves as well. there's a distinction between staggering a stability between reliable and undesirable features, and turning out to be a personality that you hate, or that would want to't stop whining about their depressing existance. it is all about staggering a stability. Ha, that is likely the longest ever answer i have ever written on B&A. Wahey.
2016-11-23 18:10:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, I believe it based on the quite different policies the administrations followed. Baker is not an insider, and Bush senior did not take the advice of Rumsfeld OR Cheney.
RE: John Returns criticism of Reuters - the only credible sources are Fox News, Rush, Beck, Hannity, etc. right? In other words, we're to believe only propaganda. You people don't know how dangerous, or UNAMERICAN you are.
2006-12-05 04:37:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Snowshoe 3
·
2⤊
4⤋
Yes, I believe every last word of what jr. say. He would never lie about anything, ever. It was Bill Clinton's fault. He is the one that made George the 1st. chop down the Cherry tree, or was it apple. Say any chance you want to buy some beach front property. In Arizona, George W. Bush sold it to me.
2006-12-05 13:18:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
3⤋
If I was Bush Sr., I wouldn't talk to Jr. either.
2006-12-05 04:59:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by Overt Operative 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
Oh I saw that whole interview, and you raise an interesting point about their relationship. He said that he really only calls them like every 2 weeks to "surprise them" and stuff. I don't know how much they talk, obviously, but one wonders. He said that his dad doesn't have access to as much information as him, and so they don't discuss policy that much. What I do think is that Bush Jr. consults his dad about people he wants to appoint, but I doubt he asks him for advice about how to run the country as a whole. I bet he just trusts his dad's judgment when it comes to character, of the people he is considering appointing
2006-12-05 04:12:24
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
4⤋
not that I'm a great fan of the previous Bush.... but if G.W. was talking policy with his dad, i think the nation would have been in better shape....
2006-12-05 04:13:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by pip 7
·
2⤊
4⤋
How the hell u gonna report her for racial slurs when its nothing on here racial...i swear yahoo is wrong if they remove this question cuz its nothing wrong with it
2006-12-06 03:32:55
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sweetheart88 5
·
4⤊
1⤋
Not, that 's why Rumsfield is out and Gates is in. And what's up with the racial slurs, I haven't seen any?
2006-12-06 07:29:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋