or even if they are getting any oil from Iraq? Also, does anyone else know what France, Germany, and Russia was doing with Saddam at the time prior to Iraq? "An enemy of my enemy is a friend of mine" (Osama and Saddam)
2006-12-05 03:45:29 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
reaLIST.
That is one reason i don't like libbies, they assume something that I have not done, such as giving thumbs down. I don't do that to my own questions, until I am ready to select a BA, in order to rule out answers i don't want to select
2006-12-05 03:58:05 · update #1
Yeah, nobody has ever been able to prove that one drop of Iraqi oil has been "stolen". Don't hold your breath.
2006-12-05 03:50:15 · answer #1 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋
No. Haliburton is in Iraq....but not the Oil Division of the company. Haliburton is a multi-functional global company with multiple divisions and resources.
Haliburton is trucking mainly supplies to part of Iraq.
Besides The coalition and America took the Main pumping, sorting, distribution plants and pipelines. Offshore loading platforms...etc etc... The day before we offically invaded Iraq. Now, if the coalition, namely America, wantted the OIL...why are our tankers not lined up in the GULF?? humm..
We did not want the oil....WE WANTTED TO keep Saddam from causing a global issue by setting them on fire again.
France, Germany, and Russia: were doing nothing more that America or any other country seeking loop=holes in the "Oil for food" program.
2006-12-05 11:54:57 · answer #2 · answered by devilduck74 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
According to their yearly statement that is filed with the IRS they have shown a profit of 3% world wide. They were given a no bid contract under President Clinton when going into Bosnia, however nothing is mentioned about this anywhere in the "un-bias" press.
So those who claim that they were given a no bid contract was a first need to look at the historical facts first then make comments about what did if fact occur.
2006-12-05 12:08:37 · answer #3 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Halliburton has no proof of what they have done with the money we gave them to rebuild Iraq! I doubt they have ANY credible evidence of ANY wrongdoing! lol
2006-12-05 11:54:07 · answer #4 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Ahahahahaha,,,,,.no no no its not like they are making any money off of the no bid contracts they received for providing EVERYTHING there.
It is utterly amazing how the truth gets warped in the hands of a conservative.
Keep your head in the sand its happy there.
2006-12-05 11:52:11 · answer #5 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I have no proof, and I've looked for it. Therefore the proper conculsion I have made is that Iraq is not about oil, in any way at all
2006-12-05 11:47:10 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
$18 Billion in government contracts.
2006-12-05 11:51:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
They don't need the oil money - they're making enough from the no-bid contract they have with our government.
2006-12-05 11:49:11 · answer #8 · answered by Amanda S 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
get a life
2006-12-05 11:47:48 · answer #9 · answered by Wael 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Do you have proof they are not? Prima Facia, Halliburton would not be in Iraq for strictly benevolent and voluntary purposes, now would they?
2006-12-05 11:49:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 7⤋