You'd think.
And isn't odd how we've never encountered a "conservative" conspiracy loon?
I believe this is quite telling.
2006-12-05 03:37:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
The body of EVIDENCE that 9/11 was a "false flag" operation and that the old media has refused to cover the reasonable questions people are asking and they are actively trying to minimize these voices is troubling.
Why did the second tower to get hit 'fall' first?
If it was due to the heat of the jet fuel then why did the north tower burn 1 hour and 47 minutes before it 'fell' and the south tower only burned 45 minutes ?
Where was NORAD ? Why aren't we upset about NORADS pathetic lack of response ? They should have been able to shoot down the other planes. We should be mad as hell that the defense planes were not set off. One of the hijacked planes made a u-turn in the midwest and flew for over 40 minutes back toward DC...
but our defense stood down. WHY?
If the attack was a 'surprise' then why did the secret service NOT whisk off the Pres.... their behavior that day is the exact opposite of what they SHOULD have done.
What about the DOCUMENTED insider trading THAT WENT ON JUST BEFORE THE ATTACKS. Millions were made in selling the airlines and certain insurers short. Who made those transactions? Why is 2.5 million unclaimed ?
Why has our gov't not investigated these gross inconsistencys and facts.
Someday the truth will come out and all the false flag operations will be in the curriculum of most students.
2006-12-08 13:38:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No I am not ashamed and I and have not to the conclusions I have lightly. I have never seen loose change or any of these other movies and never will. I make my own decisions based on rational thought and research into a matter. Every belief I have I am proud of and do not waver unless I have irrefutable proof I am wrong.
So you can call me nuts and thumbs down me all you want but that doesnt make you any more right than me it just makes you less open to differing opinions so fire away.
2006-12-05 03:41:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Perplexed 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
If I had to give a straight up answer, I would say that most liberals would like to distance themselves from the conspiracy theorist people.
2006-12-05 03:37:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by ggraves1724 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Are these the same conspiracy theorists that claimed Clinton was wagging the dog when he bombed Bin Laden?
2006-12-05 03:51:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No not ashamed. At least we see them for what they truly are unlike the druggies and the phedophedila that hide in the republican party then come out when they are exposed! Foley ring a bell?
2006-12-05 03:40:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by wondermom 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
no more than the republicans are of the Neocons o.O no, but seriously.. conspiracy theorists belong to all political parties... the ones we have here in the democratic party we find comical.. maybe you guys should stop taking offense and do the same?
2006-12-05 03:38:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by pip 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Conspiracy theorists are not liberals.. they are in a class all by themselves
2006-12-05 03:41:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by katjha2005 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
There are idiots in every group. By the way, what makes you think that all conspiracy theorists are democrats?
2006-12-05 03:38:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I tell yah, if there were con's out there spouting that garbage I'd make DAMN sure that no one thought I was associated with them. But the libs dont. Its the same way muslims dont denounce their terrorist brothers.
2006-12-05 03:42:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋