Will the conspiracy theorists shut up?
2006-12-05 03:27:18 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
But the terrorists won't attack after 08.
2006-12-05 03:40:35 · answer #1 · answered by Peacekeeper 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No the biggest conspiracy theorist,as you so kindly call them,already claim both parties are in it together and part of the The Illuminati.Yep it was news to me to so why would they change,these people won't even have to.
Small part of their idea's
"
WHO BELIEVES THE LIE THAT ANYONE CAN BECOME PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A.?
The Illuminati rule America! Who are the super rich "elite" Illuminati and their associates? The Queen of England, her husband Prince Philip and the Royal House of Windsor, the hierarchy on the board of directors of the Vatican, including the Pope; the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Morgans, Duponts, Fords, Carnegies, Melons, Bush's etc. To get the details of who the Illuminati are, put Illuminati in www.google.com "
A bit further
" Democratic and Republican candidates are "chosen" by the "Elitist" super rich organization called the Illuminati. Democrats and Republicans and the Illuminati would not want you to believe any of this. They don't teach you this in schools and for good reason: the Illuminati want to stay hidden. They do not want the masses to know that their small secret organization even exists so they can covertly continue their rule.
This farce called an "election" shows that America is a one party state. Both Democrats and Republicans work for the agenda of the Illuminati. They create a charade that looks like each party is different, but in the end the Democrats and Republicans vote for anything the Illuminati want in order to push forward the Illuminati agenda for "total world domination"
2006-12-05 11:44:32 · answer #2 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
LOL...The CON-THEO's
would make a new one. On a cold winter night. The year 2012. One bomb explodes in the Superdome New Orleans. It was about Oil and Haliburton.
Lots of money to be made off the plastic seats in the dome. The Bush Daughters are to blame. After all, her purse got stolen in S. America. Her cell phone had secert coded messages from her grandfather, Bush 41. Showwing the link between the Van Allen Belt of space to terrorists activity being hieghten due to Global Warming.
2006-12-05 11:41:53 · answer #3 · answered by devilduck74 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably not. They have to have something to go on about. And if that were to happen, you'd better believe the Democratic president would send the troops to the right country instead of going to remove someone they don't like in the wrong country. As Saddam told Mike Wallace in a "60 Minutes" interview - he didn't trust al Qaeda and was scared of them. So, no al Qaeda in Iraq, but that's where we send the troops with a token force into Afghanistan which is the correct place. A Democrat would investigate and send the troops to the correct place.
2006-12-05 11:51:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No they wouldn't. They would claim that it was rogue factions within the government who were trying to undermine their president. What you have to remember about conspiracy types is that the facts do not have to support their contentions, they make these crazy connections automatically and hold to it staunchly even when their claims are properly disproved by credible evidence.
stephanieloveswater: How clueless are you? There has been an escalating pattern of terrorist attacks against United States interests at home and abroad since 1979. This does not even include the attacks against foreign interests since 911. There will be more terrorists attacks. Count on it! People like yourself are dangerous because you refuse to acknowledge that there are true threats in the world. My sincerest hope is that all people in government remain vigilant against terrorism because I would honestly hate for you to find out how wrong-headed your thinking is the hard way.
2006-12-05 11:34:57 · answer #5 · answered by Bryan 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
you know I dont think that they will. They accused Clinton of not nabbing Bin Laden before Bush ever took office. The fact is Americans will always be disgrental. And therefore you will always have some conspiracy theorists.
2006-12-05 11:30:16 · answer #6 · answered by johnjd_cmu 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No.. conspiracy theorists will always make conspiracies... and to be honest... the Iraq endeavor has guaranteed a future attack on American soil... and it wouldn't surprise me if it didn't happen until a democratic president was in office.. not because of Bush.. just because (traditionally) these things take time to plan... and Bin Laden is out there planning........
2006-12-05 11:30:10 · answer #7 · answered by pip 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
depends how the attack is carried out and how the administration handles it. I'm sure some people will look between the line no matter what is said. Others will only look for things that don't add up and want further investigation. While others will just want us to bomb someone, who ever the administration decides. Nothing will change.
2006-12-05 11:31:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Depends on how long after the new President takes office, I would say within the first year the old guy takes the fall, after that=====
2006-12-05 11:32:19 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No... The Administration will run around limp wristed, wringing their hands. wetting their pants, and making more useless laws against all those terrorist poops...
2006-12-05 14:47:42 · answer #10 · answered by Gunny T 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋