2006-12-05 02:51:28 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
it would be a better country if england took it over again
2006-12-05 02:52:45 · answer #1 · answered by G-Unit 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
During my 3 year stay in India in the 1970's I was surprised by the number of people who told me that they wished that the British had never left, as is was much better governed. The problem with Lennin's doctrine is that it is totalitarian, the state(communist party) controls everything and anybody who disagrees with the party line is either executed or worked to death in a slave labour camp
2006-12-05 20:39:10 · answer #2 · answered by mick t 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In India most politicians buy the votes of the masses for a few Rupees, and the majority don't have a clue what they are politically or care. They care when and how they are going to eat next.
2006-12-05 03:46:24 · answer #3 · answered by ian d 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Liberal is a leninist country. There is no difference so what is the question.
2006-12-05 02:56:31 · answer #4 · answered by bildymooner 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Why should India be anything other than a good place for spiritual people to go and meditate.Leninist, Liberal ? whats that all about in the case of India. Next to Africa, Brazil & China, India is one of the worlds special places! Leave her that way.
2006-12-05 02:54:59 · answer #5 · answered by Latin Techie 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It would be better as a less repressed country - India has some hot women!
2006-12-05 02:53:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Its currently a conservative country, just like Pakistan.
Those countries are examples of what happens when NeoCons are in power.
Blessed Be
)O(
PBUY
WWJD
2006-12-05 03:02:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
what i cant get to grips with is that there are millions and millions of people in india, that means they have millions of customers, if they set them free economicaly why would they need to go els where.
2006-12-05 03:59:48 · answer #8 · answered by trucker 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋