You've been watching too much Star Trek.
2006-12-05 02:17:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kokopelli 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The original Star Trek stardates were rather haphazard; even as a child, I knew they were not only badly out of sequence, but also so different as to make me wonder just how long that five year mission really lasted. I imagine no one expected it to become the cult with many spinoffs and novels and new universes that it became. I found an exhaustive timeline here:
http://www.pjfarmer.com/woldnewton/Trek.pdf
It is organized in calendar year order, but stardates are referenced as well in many entries. (I think it was the novelists that originally tried to sort out the messy stardates into something coherent.) If you really wanted to know about the order of events in the Star Trek universe, you ought to have hours of fun on that site (the pdf file of the annotated timeline is what I have linked).
2006-12-05 10:59:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Black Dog 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
When Star Trek was created the stardates were just made-up numbers with no meaning at all. Much later there was an effort to create an organised system of stardates, correlating with years and months, etc, but while I am a huge Trek fan I do not know what this system is.
2006-12-05 10:24:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dunrobin 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Star date doesn't exist. It was a TV show
2006-12-05 10:17:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by October 7
·
0⤊
0⤋