English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

In the eyes of the world, one should know that in regards to the difference between Republic and Democracy in America, is that the fundamental concept of government in America is precisely that define of a democracy. What does references to the largest deficit in U.S. history have to do with the current U.S. President, or any U.S. President for that matter?

2006-12-05 01:19:48 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Simple. In this sense the Presidential elective process is comparative of an inheritance that comes with the territory--like the fame and fortune or infamy that is passed down from bloodline generation to generation. Good or bad, in essence, surplus and deficit are inherently reflective of the variables of inflation where we started and ended up as a nation—not something that can be blamed entirely on any one group or President. That is to say quite simply, we can never judge where we are currently as one nation, without taking into account where we came from.

2006-12-05 01:21:06 · update #1

The correlation between America bringing democracy to Iraq and the Middle East and the history of Black slavery in America based on the forthcoming novel “Bonus of Virtue” by Aaron Westley Powell derives primarily from the notion, that years after the fact Jews and other people such as Japanese Americans received an apology as well as compensation from the U.S. government for their unjust imprisonment in internment camps following Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor.

2006-12-05 01:22:34 · update #2

Yet to date, in spite of the fact that Black slavery transpired long before Pearl Harbor, and that the backbone of America was grown on the backs of Black slaves, neither African Americans or their ancestors have yet to receive the forty acres and mule the U.S. Government promised the emancipated slaves, or an official apology for the ignominious aberration the U.S. Government systematically legislated upon African Americans. At this time however, it’s obvious that the forty acres and mule aren’t going to happen, but the long overdue apology can never be waived. For this reason, how can America ever expect to be trusted or help negotiate peace in the Middle East or any other region in the world?

2006-12-05 01:24:14 · update #3

The world is not blind to the fact America has systematically denied and circumvented giving African Americans closure with an official apology for America’s horrific incorporation of Black slavery, merely because such an apology--admission of guilt, would be an admission of fathomless liability the government doesn’t want hanging over its head at any cost. But no doubt the timing for the apology is now, as “Bonus of Virtue” by Aaron Westley Powell, the forthcoming novel to be released in 2007 connotes.

2006-12-05 01:26:06 · update #4

Subsequently, through circumstances of interregnum regarding “Bonus of Virtue,” if President Bush doesn’t make the amends with an official Presidential apology, it will become a major factor in the 2008 Presidential elections. Thus, due to inexperience and lack of necessary charisma, Oroc Obama will run and lose the Democratic primary to Hillary Clinton, mainly because the world will be overwhelmed with anticipation of seeing Condaleeza Rice, the first highly qualified black woman to run for President and highly sagacious Hillary Clinton duke it out in the political arena for the White House.

2006-12-05 01:27:56 · update #5

By then Rice will not only have been politically impelled into the Presidential election process, but emerged as the front-runner and winner in the Republican primary. Clinton and Rice will then inadvertently set the worldwide stage for what may be heralded as the political showdown of the decade if not the century. African Americans will vote for Rice. Ironically, white Americans will inadvertently vote for Rice, thereby forever sealing the fate of a black man becoming a U.S. President before a woman.

“Bonus of Virtue” by Aaron Westley Powell

Contact Information:
A&B Distributors & Publishers Group Inc.
223 Duffield Street
Brooklyn, N.Y. 11201 Telephone: (718) 783-7808 Fax (718) 783-7267

2006-12-05 01:29:52 · update #6

17 answers

http://www.stophernow.com

2006-12-05 01:22:38 · answer #1 · answered by Abu 5 · 3 1

Hillary as president would be a disaster.

Already Pellosi wants to raise the minimum wage by over two dollars. On the surface, it looks great, but what about the effects it will have?

People will lose jobs because buisness will not want to or be able to pay them. The cost of living will rise to meet the increase the buisness has to pay it's employees. Small Busness will cease to exsist because they will be unable to pay their employee's.

Bottom line...unemployment will rise, number of small buisness will decrease, economy will feel major pain. The focus should be to lower the cost of living, not raise it.

If this is to be the first thing the democrats do...what next? raise taxes? Punnish the middle class? Thats what clinton did...

We are doomed if Hillary gets into office.

2006-12-05 01:40:32 · answer #2 · answered by Q-burt 5 · 1 1

I like the concerted effort to slur Obama's first name. It's the same as the last name of a recent Israel President, Barak. By the way, you ask a yes-no question, but then follow it with a nearly 700 word missive. You should read the Yahoo community guidelines and suggestions on how to phrase a real question.

2006-12-05 01:34:58 · answer #3 · answered by Snowshoe 3 · 1 2

Your question is a good thought. You will have to wait until the "real thinkers" are on to get good feed back. Currently there is no one held accountable for this tragedy of America's deficit and dead end war. That sad thing about it all is there are those who tout "to leave now would be disgrace for our soldiers" FOOEY! The disgrace is the current administration and the blind following the blind and choosing to do so. My answer is YES.

2006-12-05 01:37:06 · answer #4 · answered by edubya 5 · 1 2

You're correct in that most people in this country believe that the present economy is based on the current president. The highs and lows of the economy take years and multiple adminstrations to develop.

As far as Clinton/Obama, I would actually like to see them in office. I see our country heading more and more into a 'haves and have nots' economy that is controlled by major oil companies, pharmaceutical companies and insurance companies. Maybe a change in administration, especially with Clinton's stand on health care that we can finally see some real change. Two minorities in the White House may be the catalyst in beginning the ball rolling to a more equal distribution of money in the US.

2006-12-05 01:28:40 · answer #5 · answered by i have no idea 6 · 1 4

Political parties are merely an illusion, and all presidents are elected by THIS secret and evil group that's been in control of everything for far too long!...
http://www.rense.com/general58/suspre.htm

2006-12-05 03:47:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Okay, are you asking if that's the duo to win in '08 or are you promoting a book and getting kickbacks? Oh...a stringer line to read your loooooonggggg rant. Good luck with that.

2006-12-05 01:31:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Puke

That's conservative for HELL NO!!


Get over the slavery thing. You do realize all the slave owners are dead now don't you? My Great Grandparents took the whole slavery being outlawed thing as an apology.

Create a better future and forgive and forget the past.

2006-12-05 01:23:07 · answer #8 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 6 3

I would say Mrs. Clinton. well known to the political arena thaks to Bill, Obama has really no chance, some politician are promoting him to the white house to lose the election because to minimize Mrs. clinton to the white house, they known damn good that if she runs Mr. Clinton will be the first man.

2006-12-05 01:25:51 · answer #9 · answered by Wael 3 · 2 4

Hillary Clinton for President!!!! Republican or for the rich, and for war. Creating more deficits against our country. I'm with you!

2006-12-05 01:25:20 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

fedest.com, questions and answers