And if the world would be Leaderless?
2006-12-05 01:09:08 · 11 answers · asked by Phoenix 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
everyone is bound by the laws of the natural universe.
2006-12-05 01:58:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Chaotic confusion would result, with the strongest ruling over the weak. At least with world leaders, whether you agree with them or not, there is some direction given for all to follow.
2006-12-05 01:18:39 · answer #2 · answered by Beau R 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's called Anarchy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy
2006-12-05 01:15:37 · answer #3 · answered by katjha2005 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Everyone would carry a six shooter and practice to be a dead eye killer. Everyone would interpret the law (or lack thereof) and become the "enforcer" of his and hers thinking. Sounds a lot like our own "Decider" in Washington DC. Bless his heart.
2006-12-05 01:27:13 · answer #4 · answered by Jim G 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Iraq
2006-12-08 13:36:55 · answer #5 · answered by Mother of a Marine 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blissful anarchy...people think it'll be so chaotic and singularly bad that they dismiss the fact that no one would notice given the current global political scene.
2006-12-05 02:02:08 · answer #6 · answered by yasiru89 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Some group will always step up and take control.
2006-12-05 01:59:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes it is called anarchy but it would never happen cuz too many people really believe the bullshit hype that our governments are looking out for us....
2006-12-05 01:17:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
There would be ANARCHY and Civil War.
2006-12-05 01:28:07 · answer #9 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean as what Mr.BUSH is doing in IRAQ now ?
2006-12-05 01:26:00 · answer #10 · answered by kochani 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋