Is there really a need anymore for NASA, or is it just a waste of Trillions of dollars?

Answer 1

There's a definite need for NASA. They develop technology used in space that has applications here on earth. And that technology improves fuel efficiency, lessens dependency on foreign oil, saves lives, helps monitor patients conditions in hospitals, finds untapped resources here on earth, and more. A major source of water in the Sahara was identified using pictures from orbit. This web page you're viewing probably was sent to you in part using messages bounced off a satellite. The computer you typed your question on and are reading my reply benefitted from research and development sponsored by NASA.

More importantly, NASA programs help set goals that help move the human race forward. The Apollo program united people in the US to work towards a common goal. The return to the moon and the Mars missions will do even more. Any effort that has us working together instead of fighting is worth it, IMNSHO.

Answer 2

The old, innovative, and successful NASA- yes. They had a purpose and funding, and while not the most cost-effective group out there, got results.

The modern NASA, hobbled by budget problems, second-guessed by oversight committees, burdened with political managers could stand a major overhaul.

A good chunk of what NASA does can and should be taken over by private businesses- but where would most of the privates be without the foundation and research NASA provides on an on-going basis?

NASA's budget is pretty small- in 2005 the budget was 16.2 billion.

In the same year, Americans spent 944 MILLION just on chewing gum- NOT including Wal-Mart's sales! In January of 2005, SBC bought AT&T for 16 billion- one corporate transaction that would have covered most of the budget.

Divided over adults in the US, the entire 2005 budget cost every American 18 or over in 2005 $75.26. If you paid it in monthly installments, it would cost you $6.28 less than you pay for coffee a month. Heck, it is cheaper than your monthly water bill!

Answer 3

Yes, there is a need for NASA. I would say that exploring space is much more important than supplying the lazy, indigent masses with sustenance and housing. These people are not the ones who will make our future. We spend a lot more on welfare programs than we need to. Space exploration has already vastly affected technology in our everyday lives. Keeping the bums fed is not helping anyone.

Answer 4

I say keep in on. Space still fascinates mankind. I know it costs a lot, but wouldn't be so bad if weren't for the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. That's where our tax money is being eaten up.

Answer 5

Total waste of money.....But reconstructing the moon's surface on earth did cost a lot....