In the 1st Test of Ashes Series 1894/95 between England and Australia played at Sydney Cricket Ground from 14th to 20th December, 1894. Ausatralis scored 586 runs in their first innings.
In reply, England were all out for 325 runs in their first innings thereby conceding a first innings lead of 261 runs to Australia.
England were forced to follow-on and in their second Innings, they scored 437 runs and gained a lead of 176 runs over Australia's first innings total.
In their second innings Australia were all out for 166 runs and lost the Match to England by 10 runs.
If you want to see the score card of the above match, please click on the following link:
http://www.cricinfo.com/db/ARCHIVE/1890S/1894-95/ENG_IN_AUS/ENG_AUS_T1_14-20DEC1894.html
2006-12-05 22:19:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by vakayil k 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Way back in the 1894-95 season (December of 1894 to be exact) the Aussies scored 586 against the English at Sydney in the first test of the series, only to end up losing the match by 10 runs. England scored only 325 in their first innings and were lead by 261 runs. Following on they made a huge 437 setting the Aussies 177 to win. The great left arm orthodox spinner Bobby Peel then bowled almost unchanged to take 6-67 from 30 overs and help skittle out the Aussies for 167.
2006-12-05 09:05:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by thatniceguy 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
agree with thatniceguy's answer. todays game was the highest total of a side batting first to lose. australia batted second when they scored 586.
2006-12-05 09:10:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I'm sorry I dont even want to answer this. I'm so embarrassed and disgusted that our national cricket team should bow so readily to Warne and co.I suppose warnie will be saying ''whos laughing now'' we cant blame him if he is!!Bring them all home and save further blushes,they are just not on the same planet.
2006-12-05 09:06:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by pasky 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
that one that england just had according to radio 5
2006-12-05 09:05:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by thuddie 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
i did'nt understood ur question
2006-12-05 09:01:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋