I think it's demeaning to the memory of those who died to make them part of some conspiracy.
2006-12-04 22:55:10 · 7 answers · asked by Push It 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
A cosnpiracy theory doesn't jsut go away when somebody says: there isn't one. And don't people that died deserve some sort of search for the truth of what happened? Why shouldn't all avenues of investigation be covered, what is there to hide? There are conspiracy theories about Kennedy, no one is demeaning him, they simply want to know what happened.
2006-12-04 23:01:14 · answer #1 · answered by jleslie4585 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would guess for the same reason that people can't accept that there IS a 9/11 cover up. Our Prayers and thoughts go out to the family's and friends of the 5000+ that died in this atrocity, but ...., it would be more demeaning to sweep the truth under the carpet, and let the perpetrators go, scott free. Points to consider:
1: why has no other multi-storey building collapsed ( Before or after 9/11 ) after a fire on the upper floors? The buildings were constructed to withstand hurricane force winds, and collisions by aircraft.
2: why did the buildings collapse in their own footprints? A feat only possible by controlled demolition.
3: why did the smaller of the 3 WTC buildings collapse in its own footprints? This building was not hit by aircraft, and there was only a small fire reported in one office on the upper floors..
4: why were all the local airbases stood down on that day, making it impossible for air defence in the event of a terrorist attack?
5: why did so many of Bush's staff, not get their scheduled flights on 9/11?
6: why has Bin Laden, the supposed perpetrator not been found and brought to justice, yet Saddam Hussain, totally innocent of anything to do with 9/11 has?
7: Why has Bush changed his story several times, and refused to hold an inquiry, And stated that Bin Laden was the least of his worries?
I could go on and on with questions that have so far been unanswered by anyone in Bush's government, but, I will leave it at just the 7 questions raised here.
2006-12-05 07:25:56 · answer #2 · answered by Mark S 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because it can't be proven that there is no 9/11 government cover-up. In fact, a lot of things suggest that things were not like the government says they were. People want to know the truth about what happened and they want to know whether their government can be trusted and I think that's understandable.
I don't see how it's demeaning to the memory of those who died to look into things carefully and seek the truth (as long as it's seeking the truth and evidence and not just making things up). I'd rather think it's demeaning to not care about finding the truth about what exactly happened.
I'm not one of those who are obsessed with conspiracy theories and convinced about them, but I don't see anything wrong with researching all possibilities. I want the truth to be known, whatever the truth is.
2006-12-05 07:46:14 · answer #3 · answered by undir 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
people refuse to live in fear and need to believe that they are secure. to think that the government had no leads at all makes them question as to whether or not they were dense or just slack. why were people watching the world cup when nuclear war was rearing its ugly head? exactly. people in the government could have been doing the same...but i don't think its a conspiracy, its about being more focussed on human welfare and safety.
2006-12-05 07:01:36 · answer #4 · answered by kowalley 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Natural distrust of government.
2006-12-05 07:13:31 · answer #5 · answered by Preacher 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
PROVE to us there WASN'T one!
2006-12-05 07:14:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i agree
2006-12-05 06:58:38 · answer #7 · answered by phuckdis69 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋