IF killing is terrorism bush killed more innocent people and divided the world
2006-12-04 22:49:18 · 16 answers · asked by raj 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Here we go again; one more whom knows all on line....
Here it is so you will learn....
Osama,...Osama,...Osama,....Osama,...
Now, repeat after me: ....Osama,...Osama,...Osama,....
2006-12-04 22:55:34 · answer #1 · answered by dorianalways 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Well first in your meaning of "terrorism" it is likely that both could be wrong. On one hand there is Osama. A person who attacks innocent men, women, and children. Then you have Pres. Bush, A political leader, freely elected by citizens of the USA.
Bush has never killed anyone: And if you are calling on the Bloodshed in Iraq then I would disagree. The Iraqi factions are killing themselves. I never heard on the news where Bush has blown up buses, schools, mosques, markets, airplanes, people, or be-headed people. I have seen and heard the insurgent/terrorists groups doing so.
Osama, has divided the nation of Islam, which is far, far more dangerous than dividing the world.
2006-12-04 23:06:56 · answer #2 · answered by devilduck74 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Although this may be true, his blind constituency will never admit to such a blatant assessment of his actions. Bush has killed more innocent people, however he cliams to be doing so in the name of democracy. The Question should probably be," Has Bush now become the very thing that he has strove to fight against, a Terrorist?"
2006-12-04 23:45:50 · answer #3 · answered by The Idealist 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
AH, DAH Clinton is the big bad boogieman! Whenever Bush is the bad guy, Clinton becomes the scapegoat! Lets get ot together you defeated wacko Repubs! YOU LOST! People are sick of your crap! Bush is the crookedest president WE have EVER had! And yes in his own demented way a terrorist!
2006-12-04 23:18:07 · answer #4 · answered by stoner38 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
ok and were not supposed to be bothered by Bill Clinton IGNORING two separate offers in 1992 for the capture of bin laden. Im sorry but having a president who at least has the convicitons of going after a terrorist instead of white house interns with a cigar is alot more important to my personal safety when travelling overseas.
by the way is this a serious question, or just hillary r. campaign talk
2006-12-04 22:54:26 · answer #5 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 3⤊ 4⤋
I don't believe Bush fired a shot. It all depends on your perspective and what part of the world you live in.
Bush is president of the United States and has sworn to protect it.
The others, well, you know the drill.
2006-12-04 22:55:10 · answer #6 · answered by Cal 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
GEORGE BUSH is now the official POSTER BOY FOR OSAMA'S TERRORISTS RECRUITMENT PROGRAM AROUND THE WORLD
2006-12-04 23:02:38 · answer #7 · answered by AlfRed E nEuMaN 4 preSIDent 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I'm on your side. The only difference that I can see there is that Osama seems to be committed to a cause, while Georgie is just plain stupid.
2006-12-04 23:01:36 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
I`m not the biggest Bush fan believe me,,,,,,,,BUT,,,,,,,,I wouldn`t go that far,That`s just wrong,How can you even compare the 2 .
2006-12-04 22:55:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
The ten biggest terrorists in the world
1-GEORGE BUSH
2-GEORGE BUSH
3-GEORGE BUSH
4-GEORGE BUSH
5-GEORGE BUSH
6-GEORGE BUSH
7-GEORGE BUSH
8-GEORGE BUSH
9-GEORGE BUSH
10-TONY BLAIR
2006-12-04 23:18:51 · answer #10 · answered by mohamed.kapci 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
theyre both equally as bad, and will eventually end up in the same place.
2006-12-04 23:13:06 · answer #11 · answered by cygnusx1 1 · 2⤊ 3⤋