2006-12-04 22:45:20 · 7 answers · asked by a a 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
What makes you state this? If it is because he is an Indian, talk to Flintoff or the English Management to drop him and lay down the policy, "Only an English, born in England, both parents English, can play for the country".
There were cricketers in the past: Phil Deferitus, Gladstone Small, currently Peterson.
Surprisingly, no abuse to any English cricketer except Panesar in Australia.
Good very good, world peace is in right hands!
2006-12-04 23:05:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If England want to win the ashes they need panasar. As is it the odds are stacked against them by having rubbish bowlers. I mean look at hamerson. what sort of bowler misses the the pitch and ends up in the slips.Panasar is the only one i believe in the England squad that the Aussies need to worry about, if they cant score of Giles then Monty the better spinner by far will get wickets for sure.
2006-12-05 06:59:45 · answer #2 · answered by Nerav 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who on Earth feels Monty Panesar shud not play for England in da third test and so on in whole series.He is far beeter tan Ashley Giles who doesnt spins da ball as Monty does, he is a young guy he should be given more chances to learn n specialy in da ongoin test series as these are the real pressure game where he wud learn to cope up with da pressure bowlin to da likes of Ricky Ponting n Michael Hussey.
2006-12-05 08:35:02 · answer #3 · answered by yasir 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I strongly feel that he will be playing for England in the 3rd Test.
2006-12-05 06:51:46 · answer #4 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He should be playing.
2006-12-05 11:48:31 · answer #5 · answered by tejas_fundo 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
he's not anyway....haven't you noticed we have the mighty Gilo!
2006-12-05 08:11:34 · answer #6 · answered by dennis 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
why
2006-12-06 02:49:56 · answer #7 · answered by john 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋