2006-12-04 22:34:40 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I think she's unhelpful but good for tv ratings cos she tells you want you want to hear or makes you want to throw things at the TV. I say unhelpful because she doesn't help me (a non-american) understand the positions of anyone, she just hates ppl of a certain political persuasian and everything they stand for. I base this on the belief that she would never seriously agree with a democrat position on anything (like michael moore in reverse) regardless of how good the argument was, she would just never agree.
2006-12-04 23:27:31 · answer #1 · answered by wondering 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just another right wing windbag. She is not informative because her message is only listened to by people who all ready think the way she does. The rest of us mostly ignore her.
2006-12-05 08:04:08 · answer #2 · answered by Paul K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think she has finally given women a credible voice in the Conservatives.
2006-12-05 07:48:35 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She's an excellent writer, but a little too far to the right for me. There is a lot in her books I disagree with.
2006-12-05 06:38:13 · answer #4 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She maskes her ignorance with over the top hyperbole. She's a strong argument in favour fo pro-choice.
2006-12-05 06:38:46 · answer #5 · answered by lchamp_99 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think she in an arrogant little tart who has found a way to make money telling people what they want to hear.
2006-12-05 07:06:49 · answer #6 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Smart!
2006-12-05 06:41:51 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
She's just the female version of rush windbag, no use for facts, just loud assinine rabble rousing!
2006-12-05 06:49:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Face down butt up thats the way i like to ______ .
2006-12-05 06:41:18 · answer #9 · answered by -----JAFO---- 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋