Would you trust Tony Blair with anything?

Question

So now we have Tony Blair telling us we will have to except Trident. Whether we like it or not. What a hypocrite, he is doing his best to stop North Korea or Iran from having a nuclear deterant.
and quoting the Nuclear Poliferation Treaty, when he himself is setting about breaking that same treaty, it call for disarmament of all powers, not investment in new nuclear devices. If anyone out there belives his figure of Twenty Billion pound, they must be sick in the head. With regard to that other idiot, the leader of the opposition David Cameron, of course he will back Tony Blair, with their warmongering ways, can you see any point in changing this Government when the time comes. You will get the same policices, with a new set of liars. Be Bold Vote for a Party other that the Labour & Conservatives, you have many others to choose from.

Answer 1

Yes I would

Answer 2

TB is no different than any other politician, they are mostly all liars. I do trust him in being realistic in having the ultimate nuclear defence system. Face facts we need it ,whether you like it or not. At the beginning of the second world war the UK wasn`t in a position to defend itself and was very lucky not to have been defeated by Germany. The USA have had some very dodgy presidents, any nutter can run that country it is only a matter of time when they elect another mad man who will start of a nuclear war. (they are the only country to have used a nuclear bomb in anger and that was at the time when Japan had offered to negotiate peace) This country needs to be in a position to have a deterrent to protect it from the mad men or woman who would use them without any consideration to the lasting damage they cause.

Answer 3

Trident is a necessity.
We have to be able to deter those who would wage war against us.
Other countries in the wordl dont hold the same values,trident is not for agressive use but for defence of our way of life.
Russia , a resurgent economy ,awash with money has shown that a leopard doesnt change its spots.Iran has shown that rogue states can use propaganda effectively to fool the left wing around the globe into supporting their nuclear programme.

Trident is expensive , but changing nature of foreign threat means that defence can be cut in other areas.Areas that cost far in excess of trident.Much of the expense of trident will be recycled back into the economy.
It isnt hypocritical to ask rogue states not to have a nuclear programme while we develop ours.We have proved to the world we are developed and responsible.The rogue states have proved that they may attack neighbours at any time, they oppress their population and murder them at will.
The nuclear umbrella has kept western europe safe from soviet aggression for the entirety of the cold war.
Im sorry, but some left wing liberals really need to wake up and smell the coffee, your right to say what you want in your question was bought buy britains strong defence.freedom isnt free
I in no way support tony blair.But i feel that my country should be adequately defended

Answer 4

yeh ill be voting for UKIP not sure if there compramised at the minute but they definately look like the best bet if they get in or not. tony blair and all his inner circle of lucifarian worshipping freak shows are dismantelling this country and so is bush in the states ,there run by world banks and if the people dont wake up and get involved its game over ,we are all in the same boat world wide .i sugest you click on the link and take the time to watch the docu film that tells you why everything is like it is and why the general population are zombies sleep walking into WW3 .i gotta say if you dont watch it dont say the info was never put in front of you because here it is http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=786048453686176230&q=terrorstorm
laters

Answer 5

I don't trust any of them, I'm voting UKIP and want out of Europe. Always remember that Tony is just a figure head, he does not make the laws. All them usless money grabbing MP's do. This is not a Democracy as they do not represent the people.

Answer 6

No, from his dismal record, I don't trust him (or the opposition) with anything. He seems to think that the truth is whatever the spin machine can get away with.

Yes, there is hypocrisy in the non-proliferation treaty. The deal is that countries that don't have nukes don't develop them and those that do get rid of them. His policy gives a valid reason for others to assume that the treaty is dead.

Answer 7

Of course I would trust Tony Blair. He is our elected leader, so he is always right. You can trust him to do what he thinks is best, even if no-one agrees with him!

As to stopping North Korea and Iran from having nuclear weapons capability, if fanatics are prepared to blow up themselves and a busload of innocents with C4, would you trust them with something much much worse?

Having said that, I can think of better ways of spending the money...

Answer 8

the time has come for voting for the 'bnp' some are saying. and 'no' they are not a racist party, but some people who speak for them are unfortunately biggots, that is not what they stand for. (myself certainly not) but if anyone is prepared to read their 'manifesto policies' on their website, they address the real issues that british people are concerned with. issues neither blair nor cameron have/will face or actively carry through.

Answer 9

SIMPLE ANSWER: Bush and Tony took a bath, Tony asked: Bush how come yours is so BIG. Bush replied i slap it against the bed before i go to sleep every night.
Tony went home that night and did the same. His wife woke up and said IS THAT YOU BUSH.

Answer 10

i don't know I'm no political expert but something doesn't seem right at the minute. upgrading trident missiles, just how inefficient is a weapon of mass destruction. i don't think hes doing it alone. anyway there is no point spending a countries budget to "protect" a country that will end up with no infra-structure or resources. He should ask the British whats best for them, new and safe hospitals or new weapons of mass destruction.

Answer 11

This is the young man who campaigned for Ban the Bomb in his twenties! Peace loving Tone. What a change of tune!
The man is a waffler and talks through parts that are unmentionable.It is impossible to understand why he was re-elected after two terms of complete fiascos. People must be stupid.