2006-12-04 18:15:44 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
He is among the worst, history will tell if he is actually the worst!
2006-12-04 20:16:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anarchy99 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
What I personally don't understand is that after several years of governing and after a re-election, now Bush is proclaimed to be a bad president.
I can tell you, the first day he stepped into the White House, I knew we were in for some bad trouble. He visited Brussels a few weeks after being elected, and there he was already such an idiot. He got a question in French and he answered in Spanish. Then it was pretty clear he wasn't that smart either. If it hadn't been for the nine-eleven attacks, he would have been kicked out the same year.
My point is: why does it take so damn long for people to realize that some-one is not doing good to the nation. Why can such a person ruin things or decades to come without being punished in the end. Because people want bad **** to happen to them, in a sense, I would say....rule of nature I guess
2006-12-05 02:24:21 · answer #2 · answered by Avatar13 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I too read articles in the washington post but unlike you I think for myself...
Bush whine's and "bad Bush" is used as distraction tool..repittition of a concept works well on children and the lazy or dim witted adults...
Have you never wondered why complainers never get anywhere...??maybe because they cant bother to formulate a plan or suggestion since their 2-4 neurons r still stuck on the same song...bad bush bad bush bad bush
bad bush ...was that a rocket woosh see its bush bad bush...
2006-12-05 03:11:50 · answer #3 · answered by cyansure 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. I do not agree. The important ingredient of a leader is to react to a situation. Bush did react decisively. The American press has the bad tendency to judge a person and a leader by his success. In politics especially in international politics, there is nothing like instant and instantaneous success. Judging by the actions that Bush did in protecting the American interests, I give him full credit.
2006-12-05 03:21:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes, and he has spent more money than any other president in history! Not to mention his socialist ways disguised as conservative,(not that his administrative cabinet and speech writers aren't part of the marionette show). He hasn't done anything for anyone in this melting pot. Hell, he can't even support his own party. Look what happened to Rumsfeld and the entire Republican Party. He even allowed him to be politically hung.He didn't defend him until after the election. Anyone curious why? It's unethical and shameful. And let's not forget his his poor use of the English language.
Geez, don't get me started. I could go on and on.
2006-12-05 03:13:30 · answer #5 · answered by no worries 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
That's the spin of the media-only time 10-15 years will we know the measure of his Presidency.
2006-12-05 04:37:56 · answer #6 · answered by josh m 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anyone that believes that did not live though the Carter years
2006-12-05 05:47:02 · answer #7 · answered by mark g 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Definitely the worst, without a quesiton.
2006-12-05 02:17:19 · answer #8 · answered by air-t 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I agree and with Iraq being such a mess I haven't heard of him having too many fans today.
2006-12-05 02:17:45 · answer #9 · answered by danielschmidt94521 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No doubt about it. Pee Wee Herman could do a better job
2006-12-05 07:14:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋