English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'm trying to write a paper on it, and I'm stuck. Any ideas to expand on?

2006-12-04 17:12:27 · 10 answers · asked by Emily L 1 in Social Science Anthropology

10 answers

if i was stuck i'd go to: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=biological+anthropology&btnG=Google+Search

Biological anthropology (also called physical anthropology), is an interesting mixture of social studies and biological studies; several other ingredients make it even more fascinating. The two primary concept areas that tend to hold biological anthropology together are human evolution and human biosocial variation; there are many topics that can be studied within these two concept areas.

In order to grasp how humans evolved from earlier life forms, we can look at our closest relatives, the primates. studies by primatologists are particularly important now because many primates are endangered.

We can use the techniques of archaeology to uncover the skeletal remains of our ancestors from the distant past.

Evolution and biosocial variation are underlying themes in studies that deal with nutrition, child growth, health in societies, the genetics of human populations, and adaptation (adjustment) to the environment. For example, we try to understand how Eskimos have survived in the harsh cold of the Arctic using clever behavioral adaptations as well as biological adaptations

2006-12-04 17:31:40 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Forensics, Genetics, Evolution, Primate Studies...

2006-12-04 22:37:53 · answer #2 · answered by cafe4567 2 · 0 0

What comes to my mind is a cross between Historians, Biologists and Genetisists. Historians generally try to tell you what society was like during a certain period of time. Biologists are interested in the biological relationship amongst species and how they relate and have evolved. Genetisists generally try to show the relationships amongst species by way of their genetic code. It is a very facinating field.

2006-12-04 17:24:23 · answer #3 · answered by daddyspanksalot 5 · 1 0

I think it is a step in the right direction for a social science that has been caught with it's ideological " pants down " too many times. It introduces scientific rigor to social science flabbiness. A thing social science could use.

2006-12-05 10:26:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

My friend Colby. He's a biological anthropologist.

2006-12-05 09:23:47 · answer #5 · answered by Jimbo 4 · 0 0

Scientists on the field of ancient origin , development, cross-section, or cross-breedings of living things and their state today and what other improvement they can be capable of.

2006-12-04 21:04:47 · answer #6 · answered by wilma m 6 · 0 0

Mr. ROBOTCHICKEN. He created the first "live" robot that started out as just a plain old chicken. The result was this: another hero was born.

2006-12-05 02:57:33 · answer #7 · answered by romaniascott 4 · 0 2

physical anthropology becasue thats what it is.. just like human behavior and evolution stuff like that

2006-12-04 20:02:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

nice friggin face.

2006-12-04 17:26:22 · answer #9 · answered by em_leahy 2 · 0 1

sorry no i suck at that kinda stuff .....................LOL

2006-12-04 17:13:50 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers