She should be and she's not helping her child custody case by hanging out with Paris Hilton, getting drunk with no panties on either
2006-12-04 16:21:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by booh 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
I'm surprised she's not prosecuted for indecent exposure as a woman.
2006-12-05 00:01:37
·
answer #2
·
answered by cecikuna 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
She wasn't exposing herself to anyone. She was getting out of her car and someone took pictures of her without permission. If what you're saying was a true, a woman would have to keep her legs clamped shut at all times for fear that someone might see up her skirt.
2006-12-05 02:06:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by DirtMcGirt 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
ms. spears needs to grow up and learn how to be a woman first.
2006-12-05 01:38:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
If she wasn't famous the photographer could be sued for a number of things.
She was just getting out of a car. There is no law against that. If she had NO skirt OR knickers on then she could be.
2006-12-05 00:07:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Fluffy 4
·
0⤊
5⤋
as long as shes a celeb she will get special treatment! it wouldnt matter if she was a monkey
2006-12-05 00:34:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by ~♥~ *CHEEKY* ~♥~ 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Why does the world want to show off everyone's faults??? It makes one very reluctant to want to become successful/famous sometimes...geez...
not really that extreme, but you know what I mean...
2006-12-05 00:10:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
that is my question exactly!!
public + naked = crime
She should be locked up.
2006-12-05 00:18:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by badboy 6
·
2⤊
2⤋