English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

She should be and she's not helping her child custody case by hanging out with Paris Hilton, getting drunk with no panties on either

2006-12-04 16:21:28 · answer #1 · answered by booh 3 · 2 2

I'm surprised she's not prosecuted for indecent exposure as a woman.

2006-12-05 00:01:37 · answer #2 · answered by cecikuna 2 · 2 2

She wasn't exposing herself to anyone. She was getting out of her car and someone took pictures of her without permission. If what you're saying was a true, a woman would have to keep her legs clamped shut at all times for fear that someone might see up her skirt.

2006-12-05 02:06:40 · answer #3 · answered by DirtMcGirt 3 · 0 1

ms. spears needs to grow up and learn how to be a woman first.

2006-12-05 01:38:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

If she wasn't famous the photographer could be sued for a number of things.

She was just getting out of a car. There is no law against that. If she had NO skirt OR knickers on then she could be.

2006-12-05 00:07:18 · answer #5 · answered by Fluffy 4 · 0 5

as long as shes a celeb she will get special treatment! it wouldnt matter if she was a monkey

2006-12-05 00:34:57 · answer #6 · answered by ~♥~ *CHEEKY* ~♥~ 6 · 1 2

Why does the world want to show off everyone's faults??? It makes one very reluctant to want to become successful/famous sometimes...geez...

not really that extreme, but you know what I mean...

2006-12-05 00:10:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 4

that is my question exactly!!

public + naked = crime

She should be locked up.

2006-12-05 00:18:08 · answer #8 · answered by badboy 6 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers