2006-12-04 13:57:48 · 8 answers · asked by Mary Ann 1 in Social Science ➔ Sociology
Let me give you an example to explain my answer,. I moved to another state last year. I took NOTHING with me but a few clothes and things. I rebought some furniture and things. I had a apt but it wasn't home. I didn't have photos of my son , my things I collect, my private things, etc. all i had was a room and 4 empty walls...so it wasn't home..it was an apt. that's it. Home is having the people and things dear to you with you...even if it's only photos..Those are things you can't rebuy.
2006-12-04 16:45:26 · answer #1 · answered by chilover 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, it's not, a home is where your children can be raised in and have a welcoming spirit of the house. Your heart has to go into the house to make it a home. Your ideas have to be put inside the house.
2006-12-04 14:06:34 · answer #2 · answered by fourcheeks4 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, a home is so much more than that, not only are those we love associated with the place but we have a feeling of comfort there.
"A house is built of brick & stone, a home is built of love alone"...I've no idea who said that but I've always liked what it conveyed.
2006-12-04 20:03:36 · answer #3 · answered by Ivyvine 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe...and this may be wrong..but it is what I've grown to understand over time: A house is a shelter over your head, but a home is the house and environment you share with loved ones.
2006-12-04 14:01:29 · answer #4 · answered by makingthisup 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
That's borderline, homeless people have refrigerator boxes
they call home. Everyone else calls them refrigerator boxes.
2006-12-04 14:06:36 · answer #5 · answered by Rusty Jones 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No...that's a shelter.
A home need walls and has to have basic facilities like a kitchen and bathroom.
2006-12-04 14:01:10 · answer #6 · answered by Aussies-Online 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
not unless a loving family lives under it
2006-12-04 14:04:49 · answer #7 · answered by Christie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No way!
2006-12-06 08:19:47 · answer #8 · answered by Crash 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋