Why are most Republicans in denial when it comes to the global warming?

Question

What's up with the Republicans when it comes to searching the solutions for the global warming, environmental pollution, green house gas emission, air and water pollution etc., ? Why can't they take some responsibilities to the global warming?

Answer 1

Well, most Republicans are too greedy to take care of the environmental issues. Period.

Answer 2

Because there is no silution to global warming as of yet. If we stop all pollution the earth will still get warmer. Why? It is a natural cycle of earth because the earth is a ever changing landscape and it is naive to think it isnt. Those who believe republicans are responsible for global warming, pollution are very naive. On a final note on enviromental pollution the best solution is to just throw everything in the trash. Recycling causes more pollution than just throwing it away and economics keeps companies from creating more waste not the democrats. The more a company wastes the less its profit. I am a deomcrat and stop blaming them for the illwills of the natururally changing enviroment and start blaming them for the things they really do such as sending us to pointless wars and making all americans look like guntoting atomic families.

Answer 3

I think it's because most Republicans are independent thinkers. They will weight the evidence, and draw a conclusion. If there were concrete evidence pointing to a need for taking responsibility, then independent thinkers woudl do so.
It's interesting that you would put something like water pollution on your list of contributors to global warming. Anyway, everyone is for cleaner air, thank God that we've taken huge steps in this country. We can be proud of our accomplishments. If you don't think so, visit a place like Mexico City.

Answer 4

you are able to examine Abdussamotov's predictions. That replaced into written months in the past, and image voltaic cycle 24 has persisted -- it really is a very deep image voltaic minimum. regrettably the earth has persisted to warmth. Abdussamotov has already been proved incorrect. that is major: he replaced into calling out how the cycles of the daylight impact climate, yet he less than-anticipated the outcome of CO2 that's obviously overwhelming the organic consequences of sunlight cycles. Now that all of us comprehend the earth is continuing to warmth for the period of a image voltaic minimum, the question is what does he or all human beings assume to ensue at the same time as it cycles again to a optimal. we do not comprehend at the same time as which will ensue, notwithstanding the proper wager is 2013.

Answer 5

Because we're not so full of ourselves that we'd think we could actually affect the long term climate of the planet.

And, those who believe that humans are the cause of "global warming" know nothing about statistical analysis. While estimating event from interpolation can be fairly accurate, it is a fundamental error to believe one can accurate predict events based on extrapolation.

Besides, the expert weather guessers can't even predict next week's weather, yet alone next year's. What makes you think they can tell what will happen in the next 50.

But hey, forget logic. I guess if it makes you feel better, then it must be true.

Answer 6

They are afraid of offending corporate America. Corporate America will give their flunkies permisison to get concerned when a considerable number of their factories have been flooded out bythe rising water level due to global warming. However, by that time it will be too late.

Answer 7

I'm not a republican, but you'd call me in denial. I am not faith-oriented. Accepting the human caused global warming claims is an act of faith. Faith and force are allies.

Answer 8

My solution is to harvest the water since we have a "drought" problem.

Too bad all of the politicians who advocate global warming, don't see this obvious solution

EDIT: Wow, the libbies don't understand that I am conservative and they should give me a thumbs down. Did I... out think global warming? Or think of a real solution for it?

Answer 9

I dont know-I am a Republican, but I think we should at least look into this more. I love air too much. I think hydrogen cars are in the future, but not syre how soon.

Answer 10

They all own stock in the companies that are screwing up the environment. So they don't give a flying f**k what happens to the rest of the world as long as they get theirs. They don't see the long term effects will affect them also. They only see their ingrained need for greed.