And anyone who opposes Barak a racist, just to arm bar you into voting for them, out of fear?
2006-12-04 10:05:52 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This is what Dem Ford Jr. did to us in TN, so its a real threat
2006-12-04 10:09:08 · update #1
Most likely. Just as when the debate over illegal immigration came up they decried the Republican party who was trying to stop its practice as being racists who wished to keep down the mexican-americans. This was not the case. They simply desired to maintain our borders as a soveriegn nation. Race has nothing to doe with this. In the case of Hillary "Femanazi" Clinton, sex has nothing to do with whether people accept her or not.
2006-12-04 10:15:07 · answer #1 · answered by You Ask & I Answer!!! 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No they won't. What makes you think that they will? The last time I checked, the Republicans seemed to be doing a majority of the mudslinging during the mid-term elections.
Thomas E, those claims of yours sound like the bs that the Faux...er Fox News Channel spews on a daily basis. The last time I checked we never did anything of the sort to the Republicans. It seems to me that you're threatened by the fact that we have someone like Hillary Clinton as a senator who is extremely smart(too bad there isn't a female congresswoman in the Republican party who's extremely smart)...not to mention that she's a female democrat. She's no feminazi, dummy!
2006-12-04 18:28:11 · answer #2 · answered by iwannarevolt 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't know will the Republicans call anyone who votes against them as siding with the terrorists just to arm bar you into voting for them. And out of fear. Oh wait they have already done that. So the question than should be will the Democrats use Republican tactics to win the election.
2006-12-04 18:17:48 · answer #3 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Maybe because they aren't as well qualified as others, but you have to vote for them to 'do the right thing'?
Personally, I'd vote for Barak 100 times before I voted for Hillary. There are better women politicians than her.
2006-12-04 18:13:34 · answer #4 · answered by MoltarRocks 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Y'mean when Dems were against alberto Gonzalez as AG because he helped Bush lie his way into a war, all dems were bigotted against hispanics? Kinda like that?
Actually most dems are against Hillary running.
2006-12-04 18:39:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This has been in the offing for years now.
With Obama currently drawing so much interest, it's inevitable that he and Hill will run together, thus doubling the "oppression" factor they will wield.
Are the American people so refuted to the truth of Hillary's character?
The woman is a power-mad menace, ovaries or no, this person is dangerous for us.
2006-12-04 18:19:33 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Only if the person opposing her is not a Democrat. With a Dem they'd just let it slide.
2006-12-04 18:22:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
i wouldn't vote for either to begin with bc i have no respect for a woman that stays with a man for political reasons after he cheated on her and i dont like the idea of barak being so young... guess that makes me a feminist and an age-ist
2006-12-04 18:41:00 · answer #8 · answered by TJ815 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The liberal Democrats will not only call them sexist, they will also use terms of endearment like "terrorists", "anti-government agitiators", "supporters of rich capitalists", "child molesters", and last but not least..."pedophiles". Hey... it's politicis as usual in D.C.
2006-12-04 18:31:08 · answer #9 · answered by Gunny T 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
A sexist? No way! Vote Hilary C in '08. Giggity-giggity-giggity!
2006-12-04 18:12:31 · answer #10 · answered by Glen Quagmire 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋