Why was he so bad...I mean he only killed 6people right? I hear he's the worst serial killer ever though. why?
2006-12-04 09:45:48 · 4 answers · asked by SweetCocoaAngel 1 in Social Science ➔ Psychology
Here`s a REAL answer...in his time, s-o-s was considered bad as far as killers went. He recieved SO much publicity, not because of the NUMBER of murders, but because of how cruel he was to his victims & because of the influence of his crimes.
2006-12-04 10:18:04 · answer #1 · answered by Doctor Fill 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He's a bad guy obviously, but not the worst serial killer. I think that distinction goes to John Gacy.
2006-12-04 17:55:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
He was a serial killer. I am sure there have been others who have made bigger history since him but his occupation was to kill people, isn't that bad enough?
2006-12-04 17:56:39 · answer #3 · answered by commonsince76 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
cruelty to animals...god spoke through his dog and he wouldnt pony up for the flea powder i guess. is this a serious quesiton?
2006-12-04 17:48:17 · answer #4 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋