I've recently read a discussion on evolution, and find it very interesting.
I've come to conclusion, I'm for evolution, after all, there are facts/proof evolution is what started this world/universe. It all started with one cell. How did that cell get here?
If anyone could help me understand this, please do =)
2006-12-04
08:28:06
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Biology
This is about abiogenesis, not evolution, but many of the principles apply. When life arose, it consumed the "primordial soup", the chemical rich oceans that existed before life began. To date, no isolated remnant of the pre-life world has been recovered, so any statements are hypothesis until they can be tested.
The environment was rich in reactive volcanic gases and lightning caused heavier molecules to form. The molecules pooled in the early ocean. Some acted as catalysts. This is where the evolutionary aspects kick in. In the environment, molecules that could catalyze reactions that produced similar molecules would create more of there kind would increase their relative concentrations -- "survival of the fittest" at the molecular level. Concentration, by anchoring on clay or organic sludge would let complentary molecules -- ones that made products used by other -- would outproliferate others because of their proximity. Finally the anchor was replaced by an envelope -- the first cell membrane.
2006-12-07 17:28:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Fatty lipids have been shown to readily form membranes that have a tendency to form tiny bubbles with liquid inclusions. Free RNA and DNA which had evolved independently from the lipid bubbles, ended up being entrapped in them, beginning a symbiotic co-evolution. More complex structures which were formerly free ranging, such as the Mitochondron, were later incoporated into the cell, increasing its complexity and function. The evolution of the single cell life took some billions of years, far longer than life after multicellular life began.
Addendum: Read Anon's good answer.
2006-12-04 08:37:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by Scythian1950 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
one million) According to evolutionists, Humans advanced from apes? Humans are apes by way of definition. Linnaeus labeled us as such and he used to be a creationist. two) There are many established info in technological know-how, however evolution is only a idea. False as a result of a false impression of the phrase idea. A reality, in technological know-how, is a discrete factor of understanding. Theories attach info and provide an explanation for them. There isn't any greater category than idea. three) A transitional variety is a fossil of an animal that's side one species and side yet another. False. All organisms are transitional. four) The age of the earth is observed by way of scientists completely by way of the radioactive courting of fossils ? The age of the Earth used to be observed by way of courting a meteor at the assumption that the Solar System used to be the entire equal age. All different calculations have compatibility the age discovered. five) The medical process starts with a prediction after which appears for proof to help that prediction? It starts with commentary. Then a speculation is shaped from that commentary. After the speculation is shaped, scientists appear for proof to help or falsify the speculation. 6) The idea of evolution entails the Big Bang? False. 7) To consider in evolution is to consider that lifestyles and topic got here from not anything? False.
2016-09-03 12:42:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Many scientists believe that groups of proteins and amino acids had somehow come together in the primordial soup. A giant burst of energy, such as from a lightning bolt, provided the impetus for them to come together and started the chemical reactions that led to cellular structures, and eventually cells.
They have somewhat replicated this in the lab with amino acids and high induced electrical charges, but it is still somewhat of a theory or a mystery. If someone could actually and definitively figure this out, I'm guessing it would end ALOT of debates and a Nobel or two would come his way.
2006-12-04 08:32:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by mattmedfet 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, when phospholipids are dropped in water, they tend to form lipid bilayers. The first cell, was probably just one of these bilayers surrounding some RNA and some enzymes. From there a long process of selection probably occurred until transcription and translation were developed. Read Christian de Duve's (Nobel Prize winner) "Life Evolving" he proposes a method for the whole process up to the evolution of modern species.
2006-12-04 08:32:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by anon 4
·
7⤊
0⤋
actually scientists say there was this big bang maybe it was the cell you are talking about that exploded and this universe formed....lol i never always believe the scientists most of the times theyre worng....but u can check out the big bang theory on the web...my id is aamir_raza60@hotmail.com.....lol im just a 14-yr old boy...
2006-12-04 08:32:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
9⤋
i believe that it takes more faith for someone to believe in evolution and the big bang theory than to believe that there is a creature (God). Also it has not been proven which is why it is a theory and not a fact.
2006-12-04 09:09:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by mrs. me 2
·
1⤊
16⤋
I honestly think evelotion is crap. If the world was caused by one cell that spun faster and faster and faster then blew up then why are 7 planets spinning clockwise and 2 counter clockwise. It is just a bunch of crap.
2006-12-04 08:37:13
·
answer #8
·
answered by rkeycubs 1
·
1⤊
22⤋