They can't even answer a ? never mind admitting they are wrong about anything!
They have some extreme liberal left wing nuts in DC now, Wait and see what happens in this country in a few months.
We have a MAN in the White house that knows what we are up against with the war on Terror, He may not be a good talker like slick willie but he does more then talk.
2006-12-04 08:35:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Whoever said you need a rationale for your vote? Your vote is your vote, however you choose to use it is your business.
I know a handful of conservatives who expressed their scorn of the Republican Party who chose not to vote in the 2006 elections. Why? Because they couldn't support the Dem and no third party candidate even existed. Maybe if the Republicans hadn't sat on their butts and been so arrogant about it they wouldn't have lost.
2006-12-04 08:36:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by kingstubborn 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Voting for a change isnt wrong, its democracy. And i dont understand your main question. Please elaborate as to what you mean, and i will be happy to answer the best i can.
Okay then, dont elaborate. It seems you are criticizing the rationale for voting for change when what was called into question was the rationale for the behavior of the government in these trying times. The people spoke, now quit being a sore loser.
I dont think voting against what you disagree with is a bad thing. I think that a message must be sent. That message is "if we dont like what you do in office, we will kick you out. If the new guy doesnt do what we like, hes gone too." If we did this, these politicians would have to please the people if they wanted to keep their jobs. That is why incumbents can be corrupt, they dont have to please the people because the incumbent usually wins.
2006-12-04 08:24:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by vanman8u 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
i'm lots extra effective than "gay." i'm a complicated man or woman with many concerns. hence, i do no longer vote in accordance with my sexuality only! I vote for the candidate who maximum heavily suits all my pastimes. a super style of gays are like lemmings of their headlong rush to vote for Dems based entirely on their help for gay rights. What did invoice Clinton do for gays as quickly as he grow to be elected? seem at each and all of the applicants and then confirm--
2016-10-14 00:16:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Wow! Got to make this comment. One of your responders above, has averaged answering 222 questions per day. That's almost 10 questions per hour 24/7.
2006-12-04 08:53:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Overt Operative 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most of the Dems that I happen to know,have told me that they will more than likely vote for whom they perceive to be the best candidate,however a few will probably simply vote along party lines,but that would be the under-informed and easily swayed...you know..like SO MANY Republicans I know
2006-12-04 08:33:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
I just wish they would support someone whose motives are to truly serve and not for self-gratificiation and lustful pride. Too bad no one has exhibited such demeanor; thereforek we will never get a true patriot back in the White house.
2006-12-04 08:36:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I HELLBENT the liberal just like to vote against a incumbent by voting for the challenger. I just like fresh sheets on my bed and fresh law makers in Washington. It doesn't matter to me who can do the better job. I am a liberal and that is how I think.
2006-12-04 08:48:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by HELLBENT 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
Who votes with hatred? Not anyone I know, including most Dems. Just because you are tired of bad government doesn't make you a hater.
2006-12-04 08:27:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
I think more people vote against rather than for these days. Sad.
2006-12-04 08:32:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
2⤊
2⤋