I had just assumed they approved him last year until this week, but apparently it was just a recess confirmation.
2006-12-04 07:30:31 · 12 answers · asked by asmith1022_2006 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The most dangerous 'non-act' in recent history !!
Dammit, we really needed him . He was our only chance to clean-up the U.N. They hung an innocent man !!
Dammit !!!!
2006-12-04 07:33:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Republicans and Democrats agree. that John Bolton has a habit of speaking with blunt force trauma. This speaking technique has a tendency NOT to work when employed as a diplomat.
2006-12-04 07:33:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
because he is a fraud and to boot a complete ahole. the last thing we need is yet another george bush lapdog to prove to the rest of the world we think we are so much better than everyone else.
thank god some sensible politicians acted on this and stopped this loser from getting confirmed despite the best efforts of dubya.
now bolton will have more free time for those group circle jerks the cabinet holds in the white house.
2006-12-04 07:35:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Because they are afraid that Bolton hurt too many people's feelings when he told the truth. Maybe they don't want reform at the UN?
2006-12-04 07:50:50 · answer #4 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because he had a long history of "Date Rape" When he worked out of the Manila office. He also has 17 untried cases of sexual discrimination.
I don't see that as a problem for Redpublicans. After all Newt Gingrich traded sex for grades when he was a liberal college professor. He had 11 documented affairs with students. And still passed the Red Congressional ethics Committee litmus test for closet pervert. ( a necessity for party leadership)
Go big Red Go
2006-12-04 07:38:42 · answer #5 · answered by 43 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Because Dems love the UN & hate Bush.
2006-12-04 08:18:23 · answer #6 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Don't despair. With nothing left to lose, look for the President to appoint someone as good or better.
2006-12-04 07:34:57 · answer #7 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
He has a long record of being anti-UN! Even the Republicans would not confirm him he was so far off the map!! Typical back door Bush!
2006-12-04 07:39:38 · answer #8 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
People thought he was a little too brash and confrontational with the UN, a perfect candidate if you ask me, but hey, I ain't in charge
2006-12-04 07:32:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
they are afraid his mustache will gain to much power
2006-12-04 07:33:51 · answer #10 · answered by Lexi 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋