"than would have been expected under pre-war conditions"
Is the war going well?
Survey conducted by John hopkins university:-
http://www.jhsph.edu/publichealthnews/press_releases/2006/burnham_iraq_2006.html
2006-12-04 06:58:52 · 17 answers · asked by Ringo G. 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The survey is a couple of months old so you can a few thousand more on to that estimate, and 3200 AMerican soldier of course
2006-12-04 07:01:59 · update #1
I wonder how the blood of those that are slain daily keep from conscience of those that facilitated the mass slaughter.
arcticchi... You disingenuous individuals that say 'muslim killing muslim' need to ask yourself, why weren't they doing that when Saddam was there? Who facilitated this bloodbath? How do you really feel when you type that rubbish. Are you that challenged?
2006-12-04 07:05:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 5⤋
Note how the deniars-in-chief rush to rubbish the figure that you accurately present, as if 120,000 deaths is acceptable. There is something sick about that kind of mentality which I totally and absolutely reject.
Artichoke: Having read your attack on Humanist and then read your response, I am amazed you even have the gall to answer questions here. I suspect you are either childless or parentless. People like you make me sick. The facts of the matter never seem to affect your believes. Just the nonsense you are fed. Right?
2006-12-04 09:07:56 · answer #2 · answered by Blessed 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
FALSE....
http://frankwarner.typepad.com/free_frank_warner/2006/10/johns_hopkinsla.html
2006-12-04 07:05:16 · answer #3 · answered by CaptainObvious 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Amazing how people are so blind by ideology that they believe this study.
That has results that cannot be repeated by any other researcher.
That has results that are wildly different from all other studies.
That was produced by the same people who conducted a similar study two years ago that turned out to be bogus.
The amazing thing is that there are people so gullible so as to automatically believe a study that makes such outrageous claims published immediately before an election.
2006-12-04 07:12:00 · answer #4 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
well only if you are a homocidal maniac, in that case it is doing alright. Genocide is evil, and the engineer of it ought to be brought up on charges for crimes aganst humanity
2006-12-04 21:10:56 · answer #5 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I do not know if the numbers are correct are not, but if so, that would explain why it is taking to long. The number should be at least 10 times the amount you are reporting, and then this war would have already ended!!
2006-12-04 07:03:15 · answer #6 · answered by Smoky! 4 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Sounds like BS to me, but since you asked, I'm wondering why our military strategy is so ineffective that we only killed that number. Mark my words: Had we killed more, the word "insurgent" would never have entered our vocabulary.
2006-12-04 07:37:46 · answer #7 · answered by rustyshackleford001 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
you should also know those numbers are wrong and J Hopkins and the French newspaper that did this study has pulled the report and the numbers are closer to 35,000. Man white people are stupid !!!
2006-12-04 07:20:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Muslims killing Muslims.
And wasn't that "study" debunked because the raw data they started with was incorrect?
"Humanist" you screen name still kills me, btw. I don't think most of these "people" who are slaughtering innocent women and children blame the United States for that - why do you? I'm pretty sure you're quite young - your questions and replies show that. Don't you know the old saying, "If you're not a liberal in your twenties, then you have no heart. If you're not a conservative in your thirties, then you have no brain." - Winston Churchill
2006-12-04 07:01:55 · answer #9 · answered by Jadis 6 · 5⤊ 5⤋
And how many American's on American soil have been killed since the war started??? ZERO!
2006-12-04 07:10:51 · answer #10 · answered by baby1 5 · 2⤊ 4⤋