I find Paltrow and Madonna hypocritical. They weren't complaining about America when they were making millions off their movies, dvds, music, etc. in America. Our "capitalist" country made them rich. Let them stay in England and push their crap over there and not here since they don't like America. Ester and Paltrow would be singing different tunes if they weren't raking in tons of money.
2006-12-04 10:59:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by DawnDavenport 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The reason why Americans are mad about what she said is because it's true. Americans are mostly arrogant people caring about themselves and no one else. Not to include all Americans, but most of them it's a proven fact. They are an arrogant, no one can touch us because we are invincible nation. Not so invincible anymore are they? Every other country agrees with Gweneth's views. Just look at how many countries Americans are unwelcome in just because they have pushed themselves on to these country's and tried to take them over. I'm sure there are good Americans who don't think that way, but most of them do I'm afraid. Gweneth Paltrow can now say what she feels about her homeland where she is because she has seen exactly what the rest of the world thinks of Americans.
2006-12-04 07:40:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by ophelia2004_6 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
properly, sorry although this is the fact. and that i'm not happy with it. The British are so a lot more advantageous suited knowledgeable than individuals this is shameful. they don't have a lifestyle that thinks that sensible toddlers, good scholars, must be objectives or derided. Any graduate of the English college gadget is a techniques more advantageous suited knowledgeable than individuals. don't think me? study different letters in this answer talk board! Even their poorest human beings can talk the arts (a minimum of) more advantageous suited than different sorry professors i have had to sit down nonetheless in the front of. so a techniques as civilized, they have were given the better hand possibly. good lord, they have been a rustic a techniques longer than us. Now how can you outline civilized? ought to take many kinds, yet enable's only evaluate it because the sum entire of life and they have were provided that. i do not imagine they have were given a similar degree of fool Hip Hop lifestyle, both, not as many dolts with their pants at 1/2-mast mumbling by way of their sullen faces. so as that they are probably more advantageous civilized than we are, and actual more advantageous suited knowledgeable. that they'd be as capitalistic as we are in the journey that they were effectual financially, yet we've were given them beat fingers down there. a minimum of, we do for now, till the outsourcing of our jobs and our commerce imbalances capture up with us. So she's accurate. take care of it. Take a good look at our lifestyle and what this is become over the severe 25 years. And only take care of it. on the different hand, she's an *ss for affirming that in public. So the hell including her. i'm not a huge fan of her, both, so who cares what she says?
2016-11-30 03:21:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure what puts her under the impression that the British aren't materialistic, no, quite to the contrary. I could hardly describe a society whose country's most prized possessions are elaborate pieces of royal jewelry instead of the values of a free society as unmaterialistic. Perhaps the company she kept in America was unintelligent but there are plenty of intelligent people in America, just as there are plenty of unintelligent people in the UK.
2006-12-04 06:41:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by thalog482 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
She said that Americans were ignorant and unsophisticated, which is easy to say when you dine with the Duke, Duchess, Queen, King, whatever, while the only King most people in the USA eat with is Burger King.
2006-12-05 02:15:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by retooser 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
She said (in a Portuguese magazine) that the British are more intelligent than Americans (better dinner party convo, not so materialistic).
2006-12-04 06:34:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by samthecatrocks 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Any group of people who bow to the royals are idiots in my book ,they haven't been the most worthy. If Gwyneth doesn't agree with materialism maybe she should do her movies for free and her husband could play in his band for charity.
2006-12-04 06:54:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by cargirldawn 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
She has a good point. Americans are too blunt, whereas the English are more polite and well-mannered.
2006-12-04 06:39:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by smack_me 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Check out these news:
http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official_s&hs=qYe&sa=N&resnum=0&q=%22gwyneth%20paltrow%22&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&tab=wn
2006-12-04 07:17:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by c00kies 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who cares, she named her kid APPLE for God's sake!!! How much intelligent conversation would it take to make her happy??
2006-12-04 06:39:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Scooter Girl 4
·
2⤊
1⤋