I've been ansering questions recently like whose beter Kobe or Jordon and Kobe or Pippen. That lead me to ask the following hypothetical question. Which team would win? the 3-peat Lakers or the 3-peat Bulls? There's actually a lot of similarities, same coach, both teams live and died on two players. So who would win?
2006-12-04 06:14:03 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
Just player info with to think about:
Gaurd: Ron Harper VS Derek Fisher: Advantage- Derek Fisher Slightly
Gaurd: Michael Jordon VS Kobe Bryant: Advantage- Jordon Slightly
Forward: Toni Kukoc VS Devean George: Advantage- Kukoc
Forward: Scottie Pippen VS Rick Fox: Advantage: Pippen Extreme
Center: Luc Longley VS Shaq:
Advantage: Shaq Extreme
Key Bench Players: Steve Kerr and Dennis Rodman VS Robert Horry and Mitch Richmond
Advantage: Bulls Bench
Coach: Phil Jackson VS Phil Jackson Advantage: Even lol
2006-12-04 06:33:23 · update #1
Bulls in 7. Play O'Neal straight up, but use hack-a-Shaq. Pippen on Bryant would be the difference. Kobe would get frustrated, which causes him to make mistakes. The Bulls also have Rodman the rebounding machine, and make better use of the role players.
2006-12-04 06:43:58 · answer #1 · answered by whitedog65 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all, which 3 peat Bulls team are you talking about, because there were two. Second of all, all the Bulls teams were great teams with a lot of great players. Horace Grant was an elite power foward, Dennis Rodman was an elite power forward. BJ Armstrong was an All Star. John Paxon went to the All Star game twice. The Bulls were built to stop big men, becuase they had tons of 7 footers to throw at them. Oh yeah, here is a little secret, the Bulls played Shaq several times and whooped him up good while he was in Orlando with Penny. Either Bulls team would sweep the floor with the Lakers. Kobe wouldn't be a threat because Pippen would stick him, Shaq would get frustrated by the constent fouling and abuse he would take from Will Perdue, Bill Wennington, Horace Grant, Luke Longley, Bill Cartwright, or even Dennis Rodman, you can pick. Rodman was the original Ben Wallace, and he would give all the Lakers nightmares. This is not a good match up for the Bulls. How about you say Bulls versus the repeat Rockets, because that would have been an awsome match up.
2006-12-04 16:56:07 · answer #2 · answered by mcfatkid 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hey Ricky Lee, that legendary Celtics team won 8 in a row NOT 7... either Bulls 3-peat would smash the lakers. It can be the 91-93 Bulls or the 96-98 Bulls doesn't matter. Jordan and Pippen, c'mon, that is killer!
2006-12-04 15:15:30 · answer #3 · answered by iamblizzy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bulls in 6,even if they use Shaq and Kobe? then why did'nt they win a ring while Mj was still playing?? And i think that if Mj did'nt retire 93-94 season i think the 3peat you we're asking right now will not be ask,because i think it will be a 9 straight 91-99
2006-12-05 08:41:20 · answer #4 · answered by melo15 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Lakers. The Bulls would not be able to counter Shaq, and quite frankly, I think Kobe would matchup pretty well with Jordan.
2006-12-04 14:25:14 · answer #5 · answered by btpage0630 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bulls in 4
2006-12-04 22:24:51 · answer #6 · answered by scruffles 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Boston celtics that won 7 titles in a row 3-peat com on
2006-12-04 14:26:03 · answer #7 · answered by Ricky Lee 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
the bulls in 6.
2006-12-04 14:49:19 · answer #8 · answered by Joker 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bulls had a much better defense.
Bulls in 6.
2006-12-04 14:22:32 · answer #9 · answered by jpbofohio 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bulls have more depth in there line-up. Bulls in 5
2006-12-04 15:44:38 · answer #10 · answered by SDChargedXLI 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋