English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

VKM (BG James and Kip James, former New Age Outlaws) have waged war on WWE. They invaded Stamford, made fun of DX, and invaded a RAW house show on December 1. They also accepted the Hardys open challenge online but were ignored. Also, Ron 'The Truth' Killings (former K-Kwik) spoke about John Cena online, made fun of WWE in a freestyle rap and called Cena names. TNA want to go to war with WWE. Where do you stand and whose side will YOU take?

2006-12-04 05:43:09 · 27 answers · asked by Rockafella 2 in Sports Wrestling

27 answers

After December To Dismember, argubly one of the worst PPV ever, it's got to be TNA. An average show of Impact! was better than that.

2006-12-04 06:48:28 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I'm a big WWE fan, but I truly believe that this(if it becomes a war) is not about ratings like the last one. It's about a new boss. WWE television rules Monday, Tuesday, and Friday night ratings, but TNA does equally as well on it's Thursday night spot. If you take a good look at the TNA roster: it's like a vacuum. it sucks up unhappy WWE superstars and out of work old WCW talent and makes a sort-of patchwork roster. It's more fast-paced and less predictable than most of the WWE competition. In my opinion, if TNA wins- there will have to be a major TNA brand extension. There will be so many big unsigned names that likely- the old ECW wrestlers will go home to Philly where there known and loved and re-form (for the 2nd time) ECW. The other guys will flock to TNA and ROH. If WWE wins, it will be a pure nightmare. There will be so many new names in the company that yet another brand(or 2) will be required. It will be so confusing and time consuming, that most fans will drop WWE all together. Wrestlemania will be like 7 hours long, and they will have to make the 30 man royal rumble a 50 man royal rumble. Or Vince will just Hire the best and fire the rest. Either way, this won't be good.

2006-12-04 09:11:38 · answer #2 · answered by Harry A 6 · 0 0

Im going with the wwe they killed three big name brands before wcw ecw and the awa all reing surpeme in there prime but now wwe is the top dog plus i been with the wwe all the way and its not going stop.and all the ppl makeing fun of the wwe are former dx members so it has to be a stroyline because vince would have been invaded tna and cleaned house just like they did wcw and ecw

2006-12-04 08:00:52 · answer #3 · answered by Kingofkingsofkings 3 · 1 0

You dont honestly think tna has a shot right? If vince really wanted to he could destroy tna within a month.Name 1 tna wrestler(besides former wwe wrestlers since they were all bread there) that could hang with benoit,cena, undertaker, triple h, booker t, and edge. Nobody!!!!!Tna is biting of more than they can chew.

2006-12-04 08:06:17 · answer #4 · answered by BOB 6 · 1 0

Neither side...

WWE bores me to death, and TNA has a LONG way to go to unload the dead weight (Jarrett, Sting, Nash, etc...).

I spend my money on Ring Of Honor, and get to see a far better show than either WWE or TNA is capable of delivering.

If I must watch something on television, I'd choose UFC over both of them, but as far as buying DVD's or tickets to shows, I choose ROH over any other wrestling promotion.

2006-12-04 06:34:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I think those two guys should not make fun of anybody BG James AKA Road Dawg was a country singer and Kip James AKA Billy Gunn had that weird tag team Billy&Chuck and he was also know as Mr.*** so i dont think they should throw stones

2006-12-04 07:30:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

While nothing may come out of this mostly one-sided war, I'm with TNA. I don't understand why WWE supporters are getting so anal about two men taking a stand against some of the same crap they complain about day in and day out. It's about time someone addresses the shortcomings of WWE, and for those two men to be on television and have a decent, loyal fanbase to back them up is even better; they'll eventually be heard. Don't you hear those TNA chants on WWE TV? If WWE continue on their path of subpar DX "jokes", nudity and all-around crap, the TNA chants will get louder. As far as financial backing goes, that's a load of bull because TNA is backed by Panda Energy, who make dozens of times more money in a year (up to $219 billion/year, yes, BILLION) than Vince (up to $400 million/year) will ever see in his lifetime.

2006-12-04 06:18:36 · answer #7 · answered by brokeninboredom 1 · 2 3

WWE's side all the way, and by the way, this war by TNA and all that is a childish piece of crap! They're hoping that they can repeat a WWF vs WCW feud and hopefully get their asses on a WWE DVD one day when WWE has bought TNA and payed off all their debts and still remain multi-billionaires!

2006-12-04 05:49:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

WWE all the way. TNA is nothing more than turncoats & no talent rejects. Now, I admit I'm a fan of Rhyno, Sting, Nash, & Eric Young, but the rest suck. I understand if Rhyno's mad at Vince; Rhyno was fired for no reason. Other than that, they all suck.

2006-12-06 19:49:19 · answer #9 · answered by dude 2 · 0 0

WWE will bring down tna

2006-12-08 02:03:15 · answer #10 · answered by Fatal8 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers