English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Isn't a defeat spread out over many years even more humiliating? You can be certain more innocent Iraqi's will die, and therefore more terrorists will be created, and sworn to revenge. Not to mention the increasing number of dead and maimed American soldiers.

2006-12-04 05:40:28 · 25 answers · asked by Ringo G. 4 in Politics & Government Politics

25 answers

Unfortunately the real reason for the invasion is never discussed but is doomed to failure. The implementation of the largest base outside of the US and Europe will NEVER be allowed to exist on Muslim lands. The only way that can be attained is if the area is nuked and there are no living Iraqis, Persians or Arabs to fight it.

Also the theft of oil was once compelling, but that has also been seen through. It is a lose, lose situation for not only Bush and America but the poodle in Downing Street who has also brought the British people into disrepute. What these fools of history failed to realize is that we are now living in a totally different world from that of the Colonial Past of 150 years ago.

2006-12-04 05:52:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Because the war in Iraq is not about oil or a war on terror. It is really all about the winning of THIS secret "prize"!...
http://www.strayreality.com/Lanis_Strayreality/iraq.htm

2006-12-04 06:03:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

So if we pull out now all in Iraq will be great and peaceful?

It is getting bad over there and it is the fault of the liberals here.
The purges in Iraq have started and you have not yet seen the deaths yet 2 to 3 million will be killed if we run.

2006-12-04 05:45:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Because he is a "WAR PRESIDENT" He wants American soldiers to play referee while the Sunnis and the Shiites play civil war.

2006-12-04 05:47:34 · answer #4 · answered by Sean 4 · 2 1

Well, he wants to be remembered for something. Just like how Lincoln had the Civil War, Bush is trying to have his name go down in history books. It's an ego thing.

2006-12-04 05:43:16 · answer #5 · answered by lori 3 · 4 2

Gringo: good question, thoughtfully put, and about two years late in the asking, but better late than never.

Stephanie: wow...someone's able to parrot her professors.

If anyone here had an answer half as well-reasoned as the question, we'd be one tiny step closer to resolution. Knee-jerk emotional statements just don't lead anywhere productive. Now go ahead, nail me with thumbs-down. I know that's what comes next for anyone who dares to disagree with the received wisdom here...I'm actually looking forward to it, because it'll prove me right.

2006-12-04 05:46:52 · answer #6 · answered by Rusting 4 · 3 2

War is business

2006-12-04 07:09:37 · answer #7 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 0 0

It's all about pride, money and family affairs...
Someday, MrPresident will have to face his failure and and try to live the rest of his life with blood-covered hands.

2006-12-05 01:55:24 · answer #8 · answered by Vadim Badral Ali 4 · 0 0

He just wants to finish what he started...which means, not leaving the people he sought to liberate hanging with the mess he created!

2006-12-04 05:43:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

That is the million dollar question everyone else wants to know, unfortunately he is the only one that knows that answer, and i have a funny feeling he don't even know!

2006-12-04 05:43:10 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

fedest.com, questions and answers