Griese is much better at managing a game and limiting his mistakes. He was a pro Bowler in Denver before some off field problems. If the Bears controlled a game with theeir offense and dominated with their defense they would definitely be tough to beat. They have only lost two games due to turnovers, if they egt those under control I don't see them losing much. I really rspect Griese, he has ended up the starter wherever he goes.
2006-12-04 05:11:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by kingsteve14 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think Kyle Orton would be better than Grossman or Griese at this point.
He QB'ed the Bears to 8 straight wins last year as a rookie - then pretty boy Grossman returns - and Orton became invisible.
He was the backup to Drew Brees at Purdue.
One thing for sure - the Bears will not make it past their first playoff game the way they are playing now.
Can't depend on the defense and special teams to do all the scoring.
2006-12-04 05:30:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by ump2please 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
no way, griese is not that good either, and if they take rex out then he will not come back to the bears and they would just need to start all over again next year with a new young QB, they are winning with the D and the QB just needs to not lose the game, he is having trouble doing that now, but he has shown bright spots in the past, so i say stay with him, he has gotten them to a division championship locked up already, so why change......
2006-12-04 05:03:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by smalltd28 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think that putting Griese in would increase their chances of winning. I think that right now the bears are still winning. So the man has a few bad games and you are ready to replace him. What every happened with standing behind your team.
2006-12-04 05:02:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by redbull_photo 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They've gotten to this point DESPITE Grossman, I don't think sticking Griese in would matter. But the Bears won't win the Super Bowl no matter who is QB!
2006-12-04 05:03:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Billi Vanilli 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Griese did not do a lot in Denver, and he wont do a lot with the Bears, both. he's performed some truly susceptible communities on the grounds that he's all started, so we will see how he handles more advantageous suited fighters. although, i ought to wager a inatimate carbon rod ought to do more advantageous suited than Grossman at this element.
2016-11-30 03:17:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Brian Griese's history is not any better than Rex's. He missed a game because of tripping over his dog. Don't get me wrong, he can win a game, I just don't see him winning THE game.
2006-12-04 05:00:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by brodie917 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think their chances would be a lot better. With their defense and running game, they do not need their QB to WIN games for them. All they need from their QB position is that the guy not cost them the game. Grossman, if allowed to continue, will eventually do that when the Bears run into a quality team.
2006-12-04 05:13:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by frenchy62 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
You asked would they win the Superbowl?. I don't think it matters which one they start they both aren't good enought to lead the Bears to the title. I believe they need another QB, this is the only piece that they are missing to make them elite in the NFL.
2006-12-04 05:23:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Better, but he is still not good enough. The bears are just not well rounded enough. Someone is going to take them out bad in the playoffs...
2006-12-04 05:17:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋