this is my homework for 2morrow please answer the questions correctly i beg U ALL PLEZ UNDERSTAND MY PROBLEM?

Question

Q1) STATE THERFACTORS THAT LED TO THE OUTBREAK OF THE WORLD WAR II

Q2) SUPPOSE U ARE A JOURNALIST COVERING THE II WORLD WAR IN EUROPE.WRITE AN ARTICLE DESCRIBING ATROATIES OF HITLER ON JEWS(100 -150 WORDS)

Q3) JUSTIFY THE STAND OF US IN USING ATOMIC WEAPONS TO END THE WAR .

Answer 1

1. World War One hadn't settled anything and the diseffected peoples (ie The Axis powers) decided that they needed another kick at the can.

2. This proposition is ridiculous. There wasn't a journalist in the western world that would have been concerned about the plight of the Jews in the midst of all the fighting and had they been what would they have found? Hitler made a point of transporting the Jews long distances and "processing" them quickly so it was almost impossible to figure out exactly what was happening. All you could really say is that the Jews were being shipped off to be enslaved in the east and that is all you could ever have possibly known.

3. The atomic bomb was way more of psycological weapon than a tool to cause actual damage. Other weapons that were being used against the Japanese, which get a far lot less press than the atom bomb were far more deadly. For example, Napalm was used against Tokyo the week before they dropped the atomic bomb and that campaign alone was estimated to have killed between 110 and 120 thousand people. The Hiroshima bomb was estimated to have killed 40 thousand. In my mind if the US leadership had decided that they NEEDED to use the A-bomb to prove a point like they argued they did, they should have used it a lot earlier so they could have skipped doing things like fire bombing Tokyo. It could have saved a lot of lives. All I have to say is that if you're going to talk about the A-Bomb, talk about the larger part of the war that it was a part of. You need to consider all of the bombing campaign and only then can you come up with a real answer to this question.

Answer 2

A1) The invasion of Poland by Germany in September of 1939 brought England (and her Dominions), Poland, and France to war with Germany and Italy.

A2) Journalists would never be allowed to freely write about the atrocities being committed in the concentration camps and occupied lands by the Nazi forces (Wehrmacht and SS). Very few even knew about the existence of these camps and executions. Therefore, to suggest the possibility of doing so is improper.

A3) The use of the two Atomic weapons forced Japan to cease hostilities throughout Asia. For the Allies to attempt to liberate the Japanese-held territories, and invade the islands of Japan in 1945, to end the hostilities militarily -- the deaths of hundreds of thousands soldiers and civilians on BOTH sides would have occurred . In short, the use of the atomic weapons saved lives.

Answer 3

3.) By the time we had used them Hitler was already defeated and it was only the Japanese we were dealing with, and there could have been no bigger crime than subjecting our soldiers to be sent to Japan to fight considering Japanese militarism at the time. The Japanese don't follow the geneva convention, I know men who faught at okinawa and if I were to describe you the things they did to their POWs then I likely would not be permitted to come on this website anymore, they were absolutely horrible, and there's no reason we should have had to subject our soldiers who fight for the protection of the values of the US constitution and the values of a free society to a society that fights only for patriotism and not for values and principles that compose the state that they are fighting for and do it in the most evil way possible, especially not when we had a much easier means available. I say we were morally obligated to end the war with the use of the atomic bombs because otherwise we would have had to send our boys in their to fight people as awful as the japanese and though that would have worked to it would have been at the expense of good men, and why would any decent country ever do that? Besides, if you look at the spots they bombed at that time, it was probably an improvement.

Answer 4

Considering the fact that first of all, you are unable to even copy the questions properly, cannot use proper grammar or spelling, I can understand why you are having such difficulty answering them.

However, why do you turn to others on the internet to do your thinking and your schoolwork for you? Not everyone has this luxury; I certainly didn't when I was in school. All three of those questions are properly thought provoking, and I'm quite sure your school/classmates are just doing just fine with theirs, whether they are doing proper research on the internet, or asking others in their family who may remember parts of the war.

I admittedly didn't pay much attention in my history classes, but I would be able to answer those questions rather easily, and I remember perhaps half of what was in my books regarding World War II.

I would suggest thinking about the questions, try doing some actual research, and next time, don't leave it until the last minute and expect strangers to do your work for you.

Answer 5

And what reason do you have for not doing this work yourself?

Education is not about copying someone else's efforts - it is about your own understanding and interpretation of information.

I note that a number of your other previous questions are also basically asking for help with homework. If you are really unable to do the work then I suggest that you speak to your teacher rather than pretend you can do it by cheating on here.

When you leave school and get out into the Real World you will find that you have only yourself to rely upon... there will be no-one else to copy from and you will have to demonstrate that you actually know the things that you are presently pretending to know by copying from here.

Answer 6

You don't pick best answers. Why should we answer for you?

Here's the basic answers:

1) Some king dude was shot. Figure out the rest.

2) Write your own article. Jews were killed by thousands. 100-150 words isn't that hard.

3) It ended the war quickly. The End.

Answer 7

I completely agree, besides the fact that i might would desire to assert that folk's loss of grammar skills probable has some thing to do with them getting others to do their homework online...... that's why I actual tend to no longer answer particular questions. from time to time i'm going to element to dissimilar learn techniques if the questioner desires the help, yet i'm no longer likely to tell lillte johnny or jane the plot of "To Kill A Mockingbird" by way of fact they're too lazy to envision it or perhaps lease the action picture.

Answer 8

Q1) Hitler deciding to invade the rest of euope and wipe out the jews?

Q2) Ronding them up and gassing them in their hundereds of thousands. You'll struggle to get it down to 150 words

Q3) There is no way ever that the US was justified in doing this, it is the biggest crime in the world ever. I see your US kids are being taught that wahtever your country does is okay as long as it wins? that's wrong.

Answer 9

How about you go do research instead of asking someone else to do it for u. How are you supposed to learn and get the satisfaction out of knowing if you make other people do your work?

Answer 10

No, the "dude" that was shot was Franz Ferdinand and that started world war ONE, not two. Go to this site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_War_II

You have a brain, look stuff up and use it :)